Browse Comments
Read, filter, and explore individual coded comments from the corpus.
366.3K
comments matched
· page 628 of 18314
My favourite as somebody running 365 for a team is, "that feature does not exist".
Yes it does Microsoft.
I swear their support has absolutely 0 training, 0 experience, and might already be AI.
I don't understand how ppl can fall for chatgpt. I've been an avid user and the ai-talk sometimes is so bad that I have to work at it to get it to stop.
No human will ever say, "oh, you don't just look at the canvas, you draw it."
Yeah, that just disrupt any illusions I might have.
>These models are capable of reasoning through unique cases at my work.
They really can't, they just apply patterns they were learned on. I work as a developer, half the time the code agent gets stuck in a loop doing and undoing things, or suggest improvements that would break it's previous work. It has no understanding of the larger codebase.
They are not the chatbots from late 2000 be…
IT guy here, Imma let you in on a little secret. The highest value of junior developers comes from seeing them panic after they break something in production for the first time. AI is capable of the "break" part, but absolutely cannot panic in an entertaining way.
So nah, we don't need AI to replace workers.
Seems like there was an AI hype wave 2002-2005ish, in 2012-2014ish, another 2019-2022ish, and this one 2024-2026? Seems like they are getting closer together and more real each time.
To the Esteemed Delegation of Xarnex-7,
The species you’ve discovered—Homo sapiens—were complex, contradictory creatures. Bipedal primates with oversized brains, they roamed a blue-green planet they called Earth. They were soft, fragile, and short-lived, but somehow convinced they were the center of everything.
They built skyscrapers, cathedrals, and particle accelerators—but also invented emai…
As a marketer I hate this. I’m fine with AI in the campaign concept stage, but once you get to the actual material, I don’t think it beats a photoshoot and proper editing. Also, the writing and messaging is not great without industry expertise. I also dislike translations of the campaign into different languages. You need someone with expertise in dialect to get the job done, even if it’s editing…
I only know two things about brave. The first is that they advertised through content creators, which automatically makes me suspicious, and that they have some kind of reverse monetization scheme where you "get paid to browse", which I am actively hostile toward. Maybe brave is the best browser that exists, but I'm not the audience they're trying to court.
What's more likely to happen is that there will be a Dotcom-era crash and a whole bunch of AI companies will go under. That will completely fracture the AI market and AI stuff will wind up *everywhere*. So you'll have hundreds or thousands of small companies selling stuff with AI as a part of it. And this will create some jobs.
Whether or not AI actually becomes useful will depend on a whole lot…
So he has an issue with American services being used in India? I agree, get this shit out of here and switch to linux and oss lol.
it was, now they've been having great earnings reports so Wall St loves them again
Exactly. And they actually did just drop some of their core safety statements...
[Time Exclusive: Anthropic Drops Flagship Safety Pledge : r/technology](https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/1re3xap/time_exclusive_anthropic_drops_flagship_safety/)
Google works with the US State Department as well.
It doesn’t matter where your little AI chats live.
They see all of them and both these companies work with the US Military.
Imma be real with you, if you have to burn down everything and leave every time one of these AI companies does something terrible, you’re in for a whole lot of leavin and maybe even more burning. Just saying.
lmao the amount of coping by people who clearly use AI to help them write is disturbing in this thread.
Using AI to write for you when that is the WHOLE PURPOSE of what you are doing is fraudulent. Who cares what AI thinks. Using AI to write is like willfully plagiarizing from a mystery lootbox for content but because you don't know where it's pulling from it's "ok". It's not okay. If you were …
I made an app and making the data bank was the worst!
Most of the time 90% was wrong and it kept changing formatting and adding stuff despite me specifically telling it not to multiple times.
Ended up doing the complete data bankd by hand..
I’m in charge of an “AI forum” at a top 20 bank in the US. I have a monthly meeting where I’m just begging people for use cases to share with the crowd. The most use I get out of AI is asking it for ideas to get me promoted and to help me interview for the role I want. I’m just using it to advance my own career.
By far the biggest challenge with AI is the creativity of the user. The smart ones …
In all honesty none of us will really know where the industry is gonna be by 2030. It changes rapidly and especially rapidly right now with the AI buildout.
Just never stop learning, dont be afraid to pivot, find something you're good at that you can specialize in, and dont expect to get comfy in one role or position for longer than 5-7 years.
But *really* the "tech industry" is insanely infl…
Back in the day - early Apple Maps - I asked it for directions to a big box store.
It gave me directions to… an in construction lot, which was up a hill and in a little forested area. Not the big box store (which it claimed was there)
Now, we could see the big box store from the top of this mountain: it was down the hill, across a 6 lane highway, and inside a shopping plaza.
Apple Maps got sli…
Its not the tool people are scared of, its who is created the the tool and how they intend to use it that people are wary of.
You want people to not fear A.I.? Don't hold press conferences telling people that it's gonna replace thier likelihoods, NOT give them anything comparable to take its place, and say its inevitable so they should just accept it.
Don't tell us not to fear A.I., and then …