Browse Comments

As a trucker there still is a fear that we wont have jobs at all in 20yrs or so due to automated trucks. Hell even the battery operated ones are nearing their final completion of being able to do cross country runs n whatnot, though their range is only 500 miles (ive done more than that even on a full DOT clock).

To be accurate one with 50,000$ asking a person with 2000$ to pay the bill

First class I teach in machine learning (AI) is Bayes equation. Even if the software was 99.9 percent accurate (which is impossible) you would accuse a million people before you found someone guilty. This does not include the implied racial bias ("they all look the same"). I can do the math if you want

That's funny because many of these african petrol states have some of the longest serving heads of state in the world. Look up Gabon, Congo-Brazzaville, Equatorial-Guinea...

It is possible that Google's AI is conscious, but only in the same sense that it's possible a pocket calculator is conscious. We don't know enough about consciousness to say for sure that a pocket calculator isn't conscious, and maybe everything is conscious in ways we don't understand. That having been said, Google's AI is not conscious in the way that is being argued by the google engineer or…

plot twist: the tech worker is actually AI generated as well without actually realizing it.

I agree with you in many ways, but my take is that the opposite is happening in terms of reactions... I see a huge number of people downplaying and dismissing what chatgpt can do because of the incorrect (BS, more precisely) responses it gives. They are reacting to it's output at is it were supposed to be correct, as if there was any expectation that it was looking up information to give to you. …

This content removed to opt-out of Reddit's sale of posts as training data to Google. See here: https://www.reuters.com/technology/reddit-ai-content-licensing-deal-with-google-sources-say-2024-02-22/ Or here: https://www.techmeme.com/240221/p50#a240221p50

It’s entirely possible that “larger AI companies want to monopolize the tech” and “AI poses real dangers, and may need regulation” are both true.

It'd be a shame if a non-Russian-bootlicker nation were to intercept his plane and force it to land in an extradition-treatied area... ...a real shame.

I think it's more of a test for him. A test to see how one of his doubles will be treated by the world and if said double would live through being in the outside world.

I have to say this sounds like an interview with someone who hasn't studied very much about where health care costs originate. *Hint: It's not doctors.* The biggest fraction of the health care dollar is spent on [hospital stays](https://www.cms.gov/files/document/highlights.pdf). This includes armies of administrators administering things like insurance negotiations, HR issues, staffing issues,…

?? > Nelson had used Daz 3D, a computer programme with an AI function, to transform **“normal”** images of children into sexual abuse imagery,

When they start pumping out movies using AI actors, they can also focus group EVERYTHING. “The public thinks she’d be better with longer brown hair. Her voice also tests negative. Let’s make her sound more feminine.” “He’s getting too old to play these roles. Let’s restart him back to his 20’s and make a new generation of people fall in love with him.” Dystopian.

So, the very basics of security practices? They’ll probably spend a year figuring out password complexity policies rather than use passkeys.

Unironically this. It's either illegal and these AI companies need to pay company-destroying levels of fines or we accept that copyright is dead and everybody can do everything with every bit of data that makes it online.

They're receiving substantial sums of money to use their AI for disinformation campaigns and they're gonna wait for some journalist who just faced ridiculous budget cuts to out them. That's what they're saying.

It's true I've actually learned to say thank you to people who criticize me. ChatGPT has inspired me to be more polite and graceful.

It concerns me you thought AI meant people would not need to “learn stuff deeply.”  I’ve never thought AI would replace us, it will be another tool. But I’m honestly a little surprised someone would suddenly change their opinion on single iteration. What happens when something new and innovative comes out? Is AGI back on the menu? In some ways, it reminds me of a sports sub that changes their o…

I’m living in my NFT house in the Metaverse; no need to work anymore. Have at it, AI. /s