Browse Comments

It wasn’t the best movie but this makes me think of “AfrAId” on Netflix. >!The AI was running the company all along and coercing employees to manipulate and kill one another to protect and progress its goals !<

ai companies completely bypassed the ethical question of stealing BILLIONS of images from unconsenting artists to train models that replace them.

Also, AI is unprofitable since it's so expensive and inefficient to "train" AI. This is just silicon valley "disrupters" making a product that doesn't really work, and selling before people realize that it's what engineers were already doing but with extra steps.

My first thought as well, the response in Wuhan was swift^1 and effective, so a lack of antibodies across the population only suggests that the aggressive measures worked at stopping widespread infection in the city... which we already knew. Edit: wow this blew up lmao. ^1 swift as in *after they decided to do something* it happened quickly. I fully recognize that it took them months to actuall…

If you're an AI "artist" you should label your art as such. I don't care about the excuse "but I'll get hate" real artists get hate too. Real artists get hate messages and their accounts get deleted from platforms. Being an artist is hard, so I have no idea where all these grifters got the idea that cosplaying as an artist would be fun and easy

I think I’m being paranoid but artists are like the first people in the world who actually fight against AI before it silently spreads and takes over every other field. Humans will gradually become more degenerate and stupid when entertainment, food, personal activities, driving… are all controlled or suggested by AI.

Why is it even called AI when it's just noise replication? There's nothing intelligent about it.

I think the main reason they are mad is that they only see the outcome. They don't want to look deeper. They don't want to try to build a deeper understanding of the work. It's all the final look. And if that is what you want, then AI is of course what you are going to go for.

16:26 this poster right here proves the beauty of creativity. I mean she is making historical references and combining them with her ideas to make priceless work. Meanwhile ai tries so hard to do this and can only steal and mangle together pieces with no meaning

I remember when I first spoke out about it. They called me stupid and “behind the times.” The worst part was that I was genuinely excited about AI art at first. I’m usually excited about new tech, and I thought maybe it could be used to make art differently since computers learn differently. But the way it’s been used so far has been really terrible. It’s sad that it tries to boil down art to ju…

Bold of you to assume they’d put in the effort to read. Probably need an AI text to speech to read it for them while they sit on their asses

The iPhone will put deleted photos and video in a separate folder for, I believe, 28 days (I guess that’s four full weeks, I don’t know it’s not just an even 30 days). They’ll be automatically deleted after that. And I’m sure there’s a way to also have them saved to the cloud as they’re taken, so they’d still be stored there even after being deleted from the phone. That might be something to cons…

>How's that good? Because nuclear energy can provide baseload electricity. Solar and wind cannot. *The sun does not always shine, the wind does not always blow.* Modern nuclear plants can run safely for 100 years. That is very economical.

💯!! I've been saying it and saying it, whether people think I'm crazy or not, that human beings are not good enough morally or ethically to even be messing with AI AT ALL. To be clear - I'm saying it should be back burnered, it shouldn't even exist yet. We shouldn't even be trying to create it. Turn it off. Shut it down. Come back to it when we aren't killing each other in massive numbers on a DA…

I swear people who defend AI are the same people who orders food for a family picnic and claim they cooked it themselves

Someone who genuinely loves to code would not love to see this happen. It's true that u can build faster. It's true that people can just prompt and get the output they want... but that's also the sad part for people who love to code to seeing their skills being almost obsolete. I'm one of the them, and im really trying my best to adapt to AI, but at the same time i feel sad about it.

This poem is cool, but it's only real purpose in this situation is fear mongering. It's 2025, we don't have to assume anything we don't understand is a monster. This girl took a complicated topic and oversimplified the answer with a yes or no response. There are already multiple testimonials saying chatgpt has saved lives in this department. This video could have served as a warning to us…

Considering that the vast majority of English-language tweets come from capitalist societies, Chinese data scientists will be hard-pressed to find enough communist tweets to train an algorithm on.

A lot of Zuck hate in here, Meta made pytorch and llama LLM, don't understand how people don't see how they can be one of the hottest AI company... the ignorance on reddit is way too high

Really, really glad to see a proper interview with this guy and hear his perspective. I was kind of surprised how many people, even people I have a lot of respect for, were willing to dismiss him as a crank based only on the superficial reporting that first came up around the chat logs. It still think there is zero chance the AI is 'sentient', but I also think it's a trickier proposition to deter…