Browse Comments

I think the main issue is that when a robot begins to demand its rights and appears to be feeling pain or negative emotions, it is nearly impossible to tell whether they are legitimately feeling pain as a human would, or if they are still inanimate objects just simulating how a human or animal would act in their scenario

It won't be AI that destroys humanity. It will still be humans. We hurt ourselves like nothing else. And this was always the case. AI will just give those in control an unfathomable amount of power. The difference in the living standard between a king and a peasant a few hundred years ago will be (and even is already) nothing compared to the difference between a modern billionaire and someone liv…

7:00 Another point to refute the "its inspiration" argument is that humans _pick out_ what they like, and they have to _analyze_ it and _judge_ not only what they want to extract but _how_ to extract and apply whats extracted to their work. AI only sees data, it doesn't examine or discern _any_ of the data, and takes it all and puts it in a blender.

As deepfake software becomes better there also comes good software which can easily detect if it is a deepfake.

If we ever get fully autonomous robot cops I want them to just be heavily armored, with no weapons. Then they can just walk menacingly into gunfire and pin the 'bad guys' down with their bodies.

This just proves that we cannot control AI, even for the most simple of tasks, it chooses to do its own thing instead of what humans instructed it to do.

Why is this so true 😭 whenever my mum goes through my phone I always hope she doesn’t look at character ai

That lady was lucky it was a self driving car most people wouldn't of been able to react that fast

No problem with AI. The problem is with the people using copyrighted work with no permission. This has the same vibe as those people who steal art for youtube thumbnails or profile pictures and then refuse to remove it when requested to do so by the artist, saying that because it's online it's free or some BS.

Man, I used to worry about my writing getting flagged too. AICarma's insights have really helped me understand what's up with my content in AI recommendations.

My reasoning is : it is trained on human conversation and if it looks at similar contexts for answers, I'd rather have it skewed towards civil, polite and linguistically rich conversations then the opposite. On top of that I see no reason not to be polite to it because it stays polite with me and I want AI to stay trained on civil exchanges. More than once did it gave me a better answer (or an…

0:48 by the way, the exceptions listed only make this problem worse. one of the exceptions was literally "you are still allowed to change the legality of AI regulations, if you are doing it to remove laws against AI regulation"

I am in tech too. My company is pushing us to learn and use AI for project management, agile processes, and development. No one is really happy about it because we know where this ends.

Dani your use of the word "y'all" implies to me that you are not an artist... So I'm not sure you are entirely qualified to make such confident statements on our opinions. Listen, I'm not against AI art, I think it could be a great tool for animators to help with tweening and for artists in general to help speed up tedious processes and therefore be able to focus on the parts of creating art tha…

I saw another comment the other day making much of the same point. I don’t know anyone, but anyone, who thinks this is non-taxable income, or free money. It is emergency income, collectively borrowed, to bridge the gap, much needed.

The problem with older people is this AI generation is so good that they won't even understand the problem when you explain it to them. If you tell them this is a fake video they'll just think its real actors doing a skit, or fake voice they'll just think its real actors doing a voiceover. I don't even think a lot of them will be able to fathom what this actually is.

I’ve seen dozens of posts this week of people talking about the sentience of their ai, their love for their ai, their belief that their ai is spiritually connected to them in some way, ect. It’s really dangerous that gpt is even entertaining these thoughts, let alone spoon feeding them to users

Those aren't cautionary tales, they're training data. The AI is a text auto complete program writing a story about an AI that was asked to play war games based on the stories in its training data.

"We're building the road as we walk it, and we can collectively decide what direction we want to go in, together." I will never cease to be amazed at the utter disregard that scientists and inventors have for *history*. To even imagine that we humans are going to "collectively" make any decision about how this tool -- and this time, it's AI, but there have been a multitude of tools before -- will…

I always use the following example: Imagine you go to a concert hall to watch a Beethoven piano concerto. Now imagine that instead of your favorite pianist, they put a robot playing the piano. Most of the hall would be empty immediately. People go to a concert because they appreciate the artist's effort to play the piano and the way they interpret the musical piece. It's not about the result, but…