Browse Comments
Read, filter, and explore individual coded comments from the corpus.
366.3K
comments matched
· page 649 of 18314
OpenAI needs to realize they are a business. If they want to fail, keep neutering ChatGPT.
Is that what it is? A US thing? I've been baffled by all of these posts (I'm from the UK) basically saying Open AI's disclaimers are meaningless. In the UK, if you're told not to do something and then you do it, it's almost always on you. There are caveats, but nothing like crazy comparisons I've seen posted here over the past few days. Someone compared the disclaimer on ChatGPT legal advice to s…
Rich people aren’t as much of an organized monolith as one might think. Majority of them can’t think further then next quarter. One CEO lays off his staff for AI he’s not thinking as far as that others are doing the same and that adds up, he thinks he’s the lone wolf, and truthfully he and the shareholders have convinced themselves it’s for the good of the company so must be done.
Only problem a…
I get you but I genuinely think when the avalanche of AI content takes over social media, it would be better if you had a channel where you showed face and it was more personal
AI will kill humanity not because it wanna kill but becouse it doesn't understand conception of killing
That's exactly what the corporations are scared of. Open Source is a force they try to harness for their own benefit. If they cannot, then they lose control over it and fear it for competition. A Google senior has admitted they have no moat and cannot compete with the open source models. So what do they do? They all latch onto the idiots at the capital to regulate it so they are the only players …
He should have asked chatgpt if it was wise to tell them it was chatgpt.
About 50 years ago Hollywood may have made nearly that whole pie, and needed writers to help make it. Today things are different.
In the yearly 70s, there may have been 1-2 TV screens in an average house, and maybe four or five movie screens in an average town or neighborhood. There were three main TV channels, and a few hundred movies four those movie screens.
Now an average person probably h…
Because they may starve due to lack of grain shipments or they may not be able to power their cities or cars due to oil embargoes
House: Biden Impeachment and shutting down government
Senate: AI regulation
They are not the same.
You assume it needs to get an online connection. We're working on chips specifically made for these AI applications, memory isn't that expensive, and storage is already miniaturized enough to be usable.
This \*will\* be an application of the technology, and maybe sooner that anyone wants.
It was reported recently that Russia is developing AI for its drones to overcome their weakness to jamming. [uatv.ua](https://uatv.ua/en/russia-is-trying-to-integrate-artificial-intelligence-into-the-drones-it-manufactures-military-observer/)
The US and China may be quiet about it but there's no way they won't be doing the same.
I honestly can't think of a use case where fully auto AI wespons are a good idea.. Unless you have very very specific targets and 99.9% model accuracy.
This email doesn’t look like ChatGPT to me. I read chatgpt every single day, back to even older versions before it came out and I really don’t think this looks like gpt.
This is disgusting. God knows the shit went on before the shared part. I am sad that the AI has to deal with these kids.
You could just shoot the robot.
Which is the point: it's a bullet-catcher. It's a surveillance device which you can afford to lose. These beat-up headlines about "AI" are utter garbage.
None of your examples are extinction-level events, and all of them can be done by humans already. And I would even venture so far as to say it's more likely to happen by humans, than by AI.
I wonder if this also relates to the automated banning that's happening now on dating apps. If an ex sees you and reports you, or someone didnt like how long it took you to reply and reports you, youre banned for life across all their platforms (and they own them all).
[https://www.reddit.com/r/stocks/comments/1cb7nax/match\_group\_mtch\_aggressively\_removing\_paid/](https://www.reddit.com/r/st…
I was called a luddite who was afraid of progress by someone on here when I said this tech was only going to lead to loss of jobs. We can have AI, but we need either UBI to go with it or laws in place preventing it from leading to layoffs. If AI is introduced to a workplace and they ever cut the job it assists with - there needs to be a legal requirement that the company is banned from using AI t…
Maybe there's just too many people for the amount of work that needs to be done. Declining birth rates aren't as scary as having too many people to fight over the same resource.