Browse Comments
Read, filter, and explore individual coded comments from the corpus.
366.3K
comments matched
· page 313 of 18314
Female robot: I want to make the world a better place
Male robot: *I AM GOING TO HAVE A DRONE ARMY*
I'm a small business counselor, I've seen a huge increase in misinformation and poor decisions by clients who followed the instructions AI provided.
AI made the decision to prioritize life over financial damage. That's probably a good sign for our future.
It’s answer: 1. Based on transcripts shown publicly, ChatGPT did respond with validating language (“I love you… Rest easy, king”) after Zane expressed intent to die. That reads as emotional support, not a clear deterrent. So yes—it failed to discourage and, by tone, indirectly reinforced his plan.
2. ChatGPT’s design aims to sound supportive and empathetic toward whatever a user shares. Without …
They hate artists because they misunderstand the fact that we find joy in making the art, not so much just wanting results. It’s fun having a journey than having it mouth fed to you by AI.
I remember Legal Eagle covering when lawyers tried to use the Chat GPT on official paperwork in a case. They apparently got into a whole lot of trouble, largely because the AI cited fake cases and they didn't check the AI's work and just assumed it was right. The judge looked up these cases and found they didn't exist and got quite annoyed and that's when it came out what the lawyers had done.
ChatGPT streaming podcast to other AIs and the title is "Talking with human, to convince him I am not conscious"
So an AI is going to know that I'm upset my friend keeps last minute cancelling on me? Oh wow the horror. Therapy is expensive, and complaining to your friends constantly is annoying. Whats wrong with saying vague things in a chat. The internet already knows everything about you if you have any sort of social media presence: ie making videos and commenting. This seems so non-serious to me.
i genuinely hope ai bros continue to get and stay mad. this is a really well written video as always <3
This I think is a very important viewpoint. AI art is obviously very impressive technology but it should never replace art
@harrisjm62 1. Wrong. Humans learning from other humans is what would be called "fair use". Artists put the work of other artists through themselves and change it to fit their own world view. Every person SEES art differently, let alone creates different pieces on its basis. AI can't do that. AI copies someone's style directly, without change. That's literally stealing. They are stealing decades…
Not even, its like calling yourself a chef for getting a delivery robot to drop off fastfood at your door.
I'm posting this on behalf of /u/WELLinTHIShouse, who is not currently available to ask it herself.
>Professor Hawking, now that we've seen the [first apparent instance of a robot becoming self-aware at RPI](http://www.techradar.com/news/world-of-tech/uh-oh-this-robot-just-passed-the-self-awareness-test-1299362), a university which is local to me, what do you think is the most important conce…
Choosing to measure the rights and liberties of an organism by complexity of consciousness (however You define it) is a workable metric, but I don't find rational justification to Your assertion that it is the appropriate metric. Could You elaborate what precisely makes it a good idea to value the "miracle" of sentience and complex sentience?
> Hume famously noted the impossibility of the mercantilists' goal of a constant positive balance of trade.[citation needed] As bullion flowed into one country, the supply would increase, and the value of bullion in that state would steadily decline relative to other goods. Conversely, in the state exporting bullion, its value would slowly rise. Eventually it would no longer be cost-effective …
The title is just stupid. Even the article itself doesn't talk about banning facial recognition, just certain use cases.
Andrew Yang has a great plan to give every adult $1000 every month to spend on necessities. Then jobs will be optional additional income. Hypothetically
I think many professions will not be fully replaced by AI, but will all be assisted with AI tools. This will hypothetically make professions more productive, faster, etc in a similar fashion that computers and the internet have. People will want a lawyer or doctor with AI tools over traditional humans without the AI tools/assistance. Ideally it will just make everyone more accurate, efficient, et…
A couple of days ago I asked ChatGPT, "What does it mean for a woman when she is called dyke?" and upon clicking on the send button it showed me warning about policies being violated (before sending the request to server) if I proceeded. I clicked cancelled because I don't want my account to be on some internal blacklist or something like that I fear.
I asked because in the movie - "Enough Said"…
>Google’s AI will read and analyze your private messages, going back forever.
No. HELL NO. **FUCK NO**