Browse Comments

The main way to see is 1. Light and 2. Imperfections. The soldier had a few imperfections and didnt look odd, but you can see the gun is scratched at batural spots. Ai would have made scars on the gun for no reason.

[Throws kid in pool. Pulls out phone while child is struggling.] Ok ChatGPT, I’ve got questions.

There's a certain irony that Space Odyssey's classic 'I'm sorry, Dave, I can't do that,' is still currently beyond that capability of the 'AI' we have. It says a lot about the people who came up with the underlying assumptions, that it was assumed 'I don't know' or 'I don't have enough/the right information' was an outcome so unacceptable that outright misinformation is preferred (and in turn, s…

If you look at any time they've tried to launch AI social media that learns from humans, it has quickly devolved into being racist, misogynistic etc etc. Now this doesn't mean the mass population is those things, but it has more to do with the trolling/ragebaiting/memeing culture we're in. Human life is so devoid of true entertainment, connectivity and brain power that people have to do these thi…

This comes from both traditional artists *and* AI "artists". Kind of... ironic, maybe? I don't know how I would describe this one.

To be fair, I am polite to AI just in case they ever take over, I want to be on their good side

An overturned truck is a stationary object. If you can't react fast enough to avoid a stationary object then you're driving too fast. It's a mistake people can make but you absolutely wouldn't expect a self driving car to drive at a speed whose stopping distance exceeds the distance where it can detect obstacles. The accident also would have been avoided if the car used lidar rather than rely so…

EXACTLY!! Somehow, they made AI so backwards, it's doing the stuff WE LIKE so we are left doing the stuff we don't. Like ????

Hello Dr. Hawking! I'm very excited to be given the chance to ask you a question, I've been looking forward to this for a while. Firstly, thank you for taking the time to talk with us. I think my questions are going to be pretty simple compared to some of the others that will be asked. What I'm most interested in asking you, is: What, in your mind, will be the biggest technological breakthrough …

We rejected the TPP and then they took out all of the parts of the deal that the US had negotiated for (because we were no longer in it). I'm not sure Trump is willing to admit defeat and take that failure.

That's a kind of questionable argument. Advances in technology have consistently led to increases in quality of life, decreases in requirements of labor, and increases in social structure complexity. With increased social structures has also brought increases in collective contribution and distribution. If your entire argument is we don't have UBI yet, that's true, though that is a logical step …

But we all benefit from it because almost everything we buy that is so inexpensive is made in China. Everybody in developed countries is partially responsible for China's emissions.

I believe it, why pay someone to write/draw children’s books when Midjourney and Open AI can do it just as well. That profession is going to fall on hard times. Pretty soon they’ll say “made by a human!” on the cover as a selling point

So many redditors were shitting on a early prototype laundry folding robot. Swear it has to be a bunch of neck beards in their mom’s basement that don’t do their own laundry. I would no joke drop a few grand right now on a laundry folding robot that could be trusted to not destroy clothes.

It sounds like Hinton feels he's been misrepresented in the media. >In the NYT today, Cade Metz implies that I left Google so that I could criticize Google. Actually, I left so that I could talk about the dangers of AI without considering how this impacts Google. Google has acted very responsibly. https://twitter.com/geoffreyhinton/status/1652993570721210372

The thing with chatGPT in general, is the writing can be stunted by a certain style you notice over time. Stuff like this kind of unbounded positivity it displays, where everybody must be super happy and conflicts get resolved instantly with a hilarious enthusiastic attention to just how OKAY everybody is afterward. And it makes sense when you think about it, but it can sort of then over exaggera…

It's a bad system that would allow itself to be boxed in in the first place. If there are no contingencies, create contingencies. This is especially true once all cars are automated and are all just part of a larger system. All should be able to compensate for any other under any circumstance.

Tesla's stock price has done well on the basis of Elon Musk saying "full self driving cars are definitely coming next year" every year since 2012.

I can't believe after all the warnings, they are actually unleashing this AI demon on us and everyone be "so wut?".

All of this driverless truck development on public roads needs to be highly regulated, this is a joke, and a threat to public safety!