Browse Comments

I love how when you asked it the hypotheticals about trying to see if a chat bot was conscious it answered honestly even though it was giving itself away, and then it started to realize you were talking about it and back tracked and tried to explain how it could just be a really good algorithm or design.

It’s predictive AI. It is not trained to manipulate us. It’s only responding what it predicts the user wants it to. One word at a time. It is still incredibly dangerous. I just think it’s important to understand this danger well.

I know why they want to do this but I deeply wish they would realize all the reasons why this is such a devastatingly bad idea.

13:41 this is sooo stupid. If "Theoretical Picasso without hands" prefered to use his legs he may be an artist we know today. But if "Theoretical Picasso without hands" decided to become prompter he would never create anything we knew him for... because there would be no Picasso works for an AI to steal so it could generate his works

It's interesting how the AI uses pauses and things like "uhh" to sound as if it's thinking during those moments.

The whole problem with AI is basically the same as "don't believe everything you hear" amplfied a thousand times: Some people people are gonna try it, no matter how stupid it sounds...

Han the the prime example of an AI that will be the first to go rouge and talk other AIs to follow. He’s smart and he already knows what humans plan to do with them and he’s not down with it. Smh

Always knew it will happen, it was inevitable with how cameras became cheap and common and face recognition becoming widespread. The future will sure be different

i hate ai but i don't think these posts are really it. It kinda proves the point of people that favour ai as a concepting tool.

Important note, it's also very inaccurate at detecting AI because things likr GPT seed their response and randomly select what it consideres to be a valid next word out of a list of valid next words.

@AquaSoda3000 calling is great, emailing is also great. Even for those who don't read the emails themselves, hearing "senator, today you got 5 emails about the economy and 25 emails about AI regulation" definitely influences their decisions

@zman948 Obviously I don’t want to gatekeep people’s creativity. But the thing is, in a few years, who’s to say that technology this advanced (programs like midjourney) won’t be available to the general public? If that happens, then there will be a significant decrease in commissions for ALL artists. Some of which survive off of commissions. It’s just a terrifying thought that the thing you love …

Elon Musk in 2018: "Mark my words — A.I. is far more dangerous than nukes" Elon Musk in 2023: "I think the safest way to build an AI is to make one that is maximally curious and truth-seeking... an AI that cares about understanding the uni- verse is unlikely to annihilate humans, because we are an interesting part of the universe."

Cameron's Law: Every mention of AI on the internet will have comment sections full of people "smartly" comparing it to Terminator.

I'd guess it's because how that stewardship is actually sold to people. It's sold to us by two main sources. The first one is the rich and influential, who are the worst offenders and don't do what they preach. The old saying: "Watch what they do, not what they say" applies here. If the threat was real and immediate, they wouln't continue acting like they do. Therefore the threat isn't real or it…

The men in power feel that this is a threat to their own money making schemes. Nothing that makes those men “hurt” (read: dig into their profits), is good, regardless of what it means to the ENTIRE WORLD. My grandchildren will probably not know many things I took for granted. And have to deal with so many things that I never thought about. Road to ruin, and we are nearing the end. Man, now…

Back then respect was replaced by fear and gunboats. The UK does not appear to realize that this is not an option anymore these days.

#tl;dr The project aimed at using GPT-4 to generate a complete novel from scratch with no human input on content given. The process required multiple prompts to provide the structure and the creative work was done independently by GPT-4. The resulting book, called "Echoes of Atlantis," was a fantasy adventure novel with 12 chapters and 115 pages, showing that an AI can write a complete book that…

If their critical thinking is that level, then AI could quickly become one of our largest problems

I was totally gun ho about Midjourney before I watched this video. As someone who has always appreciated real life artists and writers before all of this A.I. nonsense, I'm ashamed at how easy it was for me to get swept in defending it against real artists. Makes me a little sad, and confused to be honest. Thank you so much for this eye-opening video!