Browse Comments

no way an r/art mod is sucking the toes of ai art amalgamations. feel bad for the artist.

Like others, I was certain it was the first one, but if you look closely, you can see a Sora logo in the bottom right corner of the second video. Hopefully hackers won't figure out how to get rid of the logos. :(

The scariest part about AI is the ability to trick people into believing shit like this.

The irony of dipsht OP using AI narrating to make this video. What a fking goof

AI is finally giving corporate greed a way for the first time ever to realize their dream of replacing not only factory workers but people like accountants, IT people, programmers architects and creative artists..... even doctors and lawyers.

Artists were stereotypically starving before a.i. I don't see the issue with pursuing art. Just be ready to fight for a reasonable price. And avoid Hallmark setups where every napkin doodle becomes their property.

This. I don't mind using AI for draft illustrations, but for anything I want to make as an artist (especially practice), I do it myself even if the result is "worse"

@DaVioletShark Human brain just automatically corrects the word if the first and last letters are remaining in their respective places. That's the explanation for why you understood it.

​@ascrinkleyfellowExactly! Otherwise it'd have to start using other AI art, and the slurry of AI'd AI art would get worse and worse.

Moving people out of poverty creating a goodwill and also a future market for american products

But remember, the person making the decision (Zuma) is making a decision based on how well it went for Mugabe, not for the people. Mugabe is still ruling Zimbabwe.

From the Article >The new research, published in the British Journal of Ophthalmology, paves the way for the development of quick and cheap cardiovascular screenings, if the findings are validated in future clinical trials. These screenings would let individuals know their risk of stroke and heart attack without the need for blood tests or even blood pressure measurements. > >“This …

For an unconventional one, live theater. If a robot (and it'd have to be robots, you'd need a visual representation or it might as well be a radio play and AI with a holographic avatar might as well be a movie) could be a "Broadway star" etc. as well as a human or better it’d need to be so humanlike replacing the human jobs with robots like it universally would be unethical

How is this different from what we have now? > His immediate concern is that the internet will be flooded with false photos, videos and text, and the average person will “not be able to know what is true anymore.” maybe it's just me, but seems like this isn't a problem with technology but rather with how we organize society > He is also worried that A.I. technologies will in time upend t…

I feel like every crossover thing chatgpt writes is exactly the same. It feels impressive the first time but is the most madlibs fill in the blank thing it writes

There is a huge fallacy in all of this. If AI replaces all the workers, the workers won’t have any money to spend. Jobs are built on an exchange of goods and services. If all of a sudden the entire workforce was replaced with AI, the AI wouldn’t even have anything to do.

Essentially those robot would render humans to be incompatible with other humans by setting a standard so high that another human meeting it just result in a lot of harm. Kinda reminds me of how demons procreate in those apocryphal demonology texts (like they act as a third party between humans).

What motivation could a venture capitalist like Andrew Yang *possibly have* to talk up AI. Gee, I wonder.

I’ll resubscribe when I see results. There’s lots of other AIs out there that are starting to match what I liked from ChatGPT.

Yeah, AI chatbot sites if anything lean somewhat more female in terms of demographics. /r/MyBoyfriendIsAI/ is a microcosm of it on reddit.