Browse Comments

Last I checked, ai disturbance was a prime feature, which is so stupid, like you gotta pay to protect your art 👹 GUYS I KNOW YOU CAN TAKE SCREENSHOTS AND DOWNLOAD A PICTURE OF THE FILTER, I'M JUST SAYING I THINK IS MESSED UP THAT YOU HAVE TO PAY TO USE IT NORMALLY

If AI really ends up “doing everything,” the real question isn’t how we make money it’s how we stay relevant in a system that doesn’t need us. 12 Codes of Collapse calls this Code 4: “The Redundant Class,” where humans are left with symbolic jobs while AI holds all the real levers of wealth. That chapter felt far-fetched when I read it… now it feels like a prelude.

This is spot on. I tried to make my game using AI images but I realized, as you point out, that I was cheating myself out of the fun part of making a game. I love to draw and paint, and even if the result looks nothing like other professional games, maybe that isn't so bad. At least it will look like something that I have made and that reflects my own taste and personality, it will look unique. I…

Legal is another problem people aren’t talking enough. The vendor and customer both have legal departments that each want the other to shoulder the blame when the AI screws up. It stymies deals.

Aside from the tremendously creepy aspect, it's good that you brought up how deepfake porn could potentially be damaging to the careers of the people being deepfaked. Think about it; the wrong people see something like that, like advertisers or investors, they might get fooled by it and decide to cut business ties with the people getting deepfaked. In short, just imagine your favorite content cre…

yo meta AI gotta chill with these fails 💀, i'm sticking with Storychat for now where characters at least change expressions

AI "artists" acting like "coming up with an idea" is something traditional artists don't do💀

My friend knew an artist who had lost use of both of his hands and learned to draw amazingly with his MOUTH. Beethoven was deaf and composed incredible pieces. Also, why are we putting value solely on how art looks when a very important aspect is the creation of art itself. The "ableism" argument for AI falls so flat.

I HATEEEE WHEN AI STEALS ART. Like we spend hours on it and then you just come, steal it, and “give” it to people after taking 2 seconds to finish it. ALSO CLAIMING ITS ART ITS BULLCRAP ITS JUST STOLEN COMPUTER AJDNVOISJEFNVOIURSFNVV Also edit: good there’s a way to kinda prevent it now

A calculator that get things wrong 15% of the time is still a bad calculator, no matter how impressive it is - The same goes for AI

isn't it more offensive to assume that poor people, disabled people, and people of color need chatgpt to write a novel 💀💀💀💀💀

I remember a story of a computer scientist in the 70's who created a chat bot therapist. All it would do is ask how XYZ made you feel no matter what you wrote about. He eventually shut down the project because testers were getting addicted to talking with the bot, and he was afraid of the narcissian ramifications.

I feel like tech companies are just saying anything about AI just because it makes their stock rise by 0.5 every time they mention it

Making art with ai is like calling yourself a chef by opening a canned food

The original Wired article is FULL of gems: “ The same logic, however, apparently does not apply to left-wing influencer accounts, as Sam learned when he created a short-lived liberal counterpart for Emily on Instagram: “Democrats know that it’s AI slop, so they don’t engage as much.” (Sam’s explanation for why MAGA influencer accounts work is blunt: “The MAGA crowd is made up of dumb people—lik…

People get confused about the Kalogeras sisters because their mom once showed some support for Trump, but that doesn’t mean the girls do. In fact Demitra herself said on August 20, 2025: we are not Trump supporters and we are not Zionists.’ But let’s be clear — the only reason she even said that is because people accused them of being Z…

Remember kids, you can draw AI artists pregnant and there's no moderation software stopping you

Got to love how everyone is like”Chatgpt is going to take over everything” and then every time you apply it to something real like this it consistently comes up short

This needs to be all facial recognition on public property. Otherwise, private companies will just gather the data and sell it to the government or other private companies. If private companies want to do this, they need to confine the technology to people who enter their private property only.

I think most people are pretty satisfied. Hes running a minority government. So it's not just the liberal party passing these bills. He and his party designed and introduced them, but they have to be agreed on by other party members.