Browse Comments
Read, filter, and explore individual coded comments from the corpus.
366.3K
comments matched
· page 23 of 18314
I kinda expected the robot to say “I’m alive”,then the other robot shoots them and it says “I’m dead”
Thats insane! You should have a live conversation with ChatGPT on the podcast and do something like this and see if ChatGPT can say something like this LIVE on the podcast
AI 'ARTIST' stop not you calling them artists 😭 edit: can y'all stop argueing with me it's my opinion omg edit 2: guys this is old. you are free to argue with me, but i dont believe they are artstists. its not the ppl who use or make it its ppl steaking art for ai and putting artists out of the job.
It’s wild how close this feels to what Selwyn Raithe described in his book . Not AI “thinking for us” but quietly shaping the frame of thought itself. That’s the part that really keeps me awake at night.
It’s scary the fact that humans cant even tell if it’s AI or not
Edit: guys calm sure I meant men (who are also humans) but ok
>The girls begged for help, first from a school guidance counselor and then from a sheriff’s deputy assigned to their school. But the images were shared on [Snapchat](https://fortune.com/company/snap/), an app that deletes messages seconds after they’re viewed, and the adults couldn’t find them. The principal had doubts they even existed.
....
In Lafourche Parish, the school district follo…
"lets automate everything except for the higher ups making all the dough"
"oh shit noone can afford anything due to every job being automated"
For anyone wondering why the thumbnail says "AI is Alchemy", here's the quote from the book:
"If you know the history of science, this kind of talk is recognizable as the stage of folk theory, the stage where lots of different people are inventing lots of different theories that appeal to them personally, the sort of way that people talk before science has really gotten started on something. The…
That's the scary part. There are less jobs available. It's not a question of shifting industries and adapting. People that want to adapt can't, because there are less available jobs out there.
The only thing they could do to adapt may be to be an entrepreneur but that requires large capital to start. It's a really messed up situation.
Exactly this. It outputs, potentially, chemically stable compounds using constituent chemicals and groups within the illicit drug sample set. No idea of any of the effects or properties of them. Basically an anagram algorithm for chemical compounds and it output millions of words that are unintelligible. Just because the letters can fit together doesn't make them mean anything.
as an artist, I would like to point out that the "stealing from artists" argument honestly has very little to do with AI being able to replicate our art styles, and more to do with the fact that our art was used without our permission in order to program the AI.
Almost every artist I've talked to about this is more angry about the fact that our art is being stolen by random techies and fed into …
OMG they are shocked that Brexit has 2 sides.
They wanted to stop EU citizens working in UK, but shocked that now they can no longer freely work in mainland Europe.
What's shocker!
I looked up Artisan AI to see what it actually does. It’s to replace outbound sales calls. I mean, okay I’m glad humans aren’t having to do those, but most humans also don’t want to hear outbound sales calls either. So I’m going to create an AI to answer all these calls for us so AIs can just talk to each other and leave us humans out of it
Ai "Artists Vs actual artists" has to be some of my fav things on the internet
Edit: Thanks to "somenonsense7997" for pointing out my error
I dont know man. Just because AI can do the job doesn’t mean I want it to. A lot of those careers, I want to talk to a human and have that physical connection.
IBM Internal presentation slide, circa 1979; "A COMPUTER CAN NEVER BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE THEREFORE A COMPUTER MUST NEVER MAKE A MANAGEMENT DECISION" is the perfect response to any of this. no algorithm should ever decide the fate of who lives who dies, whose life get's cut by 30 and whose by 3 years.
Hearing this from an armed robot dog, would be one of the most terrifying dystopian things ever.
The media made him sound like he was some crazy religious guy who went on a crusade to liberate and give rights to all robots but in this interview he actually sounds well spoken and rational about it and looks more concerned about how this would affect humans rather than AI itself.
And an AI CEO doesn't need to bloat out the company's stock to make itself rich. You can give it prompts like "don't be a sociopath." And since AIs are so good at misleading people, your AI CEO can still function as a plausible liar.
This is true but Trump expanded it to all global health funding affecting many more organizations
https://www.google.com/amp/amp.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2017/01/trump_s_global_gag_rule_is_even_worse_than_it_seemed.html?client=safari