Browse Comments

So what I gather is, produce as many stupid ai images in grok as possible to drain the money supply.

Polarization is a classic reaction to any breakthrough technology, especially when there’s a lack of transparency on how it works (and misinformation only fuels the fire). Thats said, I think we’re looking at a peerless radical shift. Unlike previous tools, AI is designed to scale infinitely and is evolving into an entirely new species of intelligence (following the human one), rather than just …

It seems wild to me that LLM models know about competing LLM models but here we are

I see a lot of people frustrated with their AI “arguing back” or giving soft, vague answers. Most of the time, that isn’t the model; it’s the lack of a framework. This is a copy/paste‑able functional skeleton you can give directly to your AI. It’s not “my” framework, but it’s built from the principles I use. Its whole purpose is to preserve accuracy and structure over user pleasing fluff. Make …

See a therapist honey, if you rely on AI this much. That brain is wired wrong.

I would be fine with ai doctors and lawyers. Honestly the 2 best fields to automate by ai. They should both be heavily rule and pattern driven, and when they're not it's typically a bad thing.

With all due respect and without intent to be insulting, my basic premise is that you are "mentally ill" by the very fact that these thoughts/emotions and desires occur within you. I certainly applaud your Rules and I hope they serve you well in both avoiding harm and avoiding consequences for doing such harm. I hope it is understood that I believe there is no shame or negative connotation to…

Not a good start to the autonomous vehicle industry. These vehicles, if widely used, would need to be safe for literally millions of miles driven. But those aren't even the issues that bother me. I am totally on board with the idea. However, my concerns deal with obligations when things go wrong and how much of the car would I actually own. First, things will go wrong at some point. And w…

This isn't legitimate traditional Chinese medicine and should not be lumped together as such. This is superstition and unsupported to boot. Actual TCM has legitimate medicinal purposes and research in that field has won the Nobel Prize in Medicine.

They're not eating all the animals. They're snorting them to try and cure erectile dysfunction.

I don’t mean to change subject, but I feel when personal anecdotes become involved m not responding to an argument on its merit so much as individual experience. On this instance your pain is far from anything I would want to challenge, but the language used I find very limiting. Edit: I’m curious do you guys disagree? I don’t really know how to say I disagree with the construct in a way that do…

It won't be decades. Autonomous cars are already much safer than humans, that's why you hear about every crash. In 2-3 years they will be much, much better than any human.

Something that needs to be looked into more at least. Outright fake news though? Not so sure.

That just isn't true. If it were truly a pollutant, or at the current levels of 420 ppm, ie: 'harmful concentrations' then cannabis farmers would not artificially increase CO2 levels to 1500 ppm in their gardens.

It is the result of raising the CO2 levels slightly. The only 'proven' reaction of raising CO2 levels, is increased plant growth.

>By that logic, demolishing 2.5 acres of Rainforest is likely 8x more damaging to tree biodiversity as demolishing all of the United Kingdom That logic assumes that those ~750 species are exclusively found on that 2.5 acres.

Chicken little's at it again. Remember when we were going to face global famine by 2000? GMO fixes almost everything.

You mean the global food supply which keeps setting new records year after year? You really would have to be very simple to fall for this crock of shit.

I was just pointing out the sensationalist BS of this article. Imagine calling it “digestive crisis disaster” ever time you had diarrhea

Algorithms are created by people so I can easily see how a bias can be programmed into them. Same for YouTube or Twitter or any of those.