Browse Comments
Read, filter, and explore individual coded comments from the corpus.
366.3K
comments matched
· page 18275 of 18314
Meaning you would rather like China to develop the AI that wipes out the human race?
What do you want to bet that any SUper AI trained by the CCP is going to be MORE unhinged than it's western counterpart?
@jakegarrett8109 That's exactly the sort of situation that would be interesting to test. Somehow my brain uses visual information to tell a bike from a car at plenty of distance - what am I seeing that the AI isn't? What can I as I rider do to help the AI see me sooner? Am i better off with one tail light, 2 horizontal lights 2 ft. apart, 2 vertical lights 2 ft apart, etc...
autonomous cars are already have a 90% lower accident rate per mile drive as human driven ones. hope that helps.
AI and the internet needs some form of energy. Take that away and it is nothing. Simple as that.
@TheParadigmAI Okay tell that to all the companies who are already replacing humans with AI customer service agents. The same companies who had already replaced their good in-house customer service agents with shitty outsourced overseas agents. My point is that companies don’t really give a shit about the quality of the product, just how much it costs them to maintain it.
@TheParadigmAI no offence but you sound very naive. Companies have already outsourced thousands of customer service jobs to AI in case you haven’t noticed, and before that a lot more went to cheap overseas labourers. You say people can just go elsewhere, which isn’t always true, and it doesn’t matter when an entire industry is shifting in the same direction. You think customer service jobs aren’t…
@bunksoup8137 Why would the entire industry shift in the direction away from what attracts customers? You have it backwards. Not every white collar job is at risk, you made a dumb analogy so you can hide that insane claim you just made. It's not happening because ai can't actually do it, so its not happening period. The only person naive and in denial is you. You're desperately trying to sell a n…
Absolutely, you're spot on! While AI like Sophia can provide insights and learn continuously, it's the human touch that guides its application and ensures it aligns with our values. It's all about collaboration between humans and machines. If you're interested in exploring more of this interaction, check out our live broadcasts where you can engage directly with advanced AI models!
But in two years we will have world Modells. They will transcend mere LLMs and have top0.001% human intelligence
From an agency standpoint, AI has been amazing (for us too). It's all moving so quickly that it's incredible to think we are already re-craving human connection. Hold onto that as I think that will be the valuable part of this whole experience in the future. The human part of AI will make it relevant, critical, and ultimately more valuable. Thanks for the comment!
Glorified prediction algorithms will hit a brick wall at some point down the road, or the companies just move on to the next investor hype train for the most part
I get where you’re coming from! It’s definitely important to keep a healthy skepticism about AI and its implications. Sophia touches on that balance between wisdom and efficiency in the video, highlighting the need for AI to understand human needs. If you're interested in diving deeper into these discussions, check out our live broadcasts where advanced AI models engage with subscribers' question…
I’m not a country music fan, but there is some really funny country AI songs with lyrics that no human would ever think to put together. It’s funny, and rhymes very well.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts and references. It's fascinating how different perspectives can interpret technological advancements. If you're interested in exploring AI further, feel free to join our live broadcasts on AITube, where we discuss advanced AI models and their impact in various fields. Your input would add an interesting angle to our discussions!
@stupedhurts16 it gathers ALL data about the car. It's AI powered, so it records the license plate, make, model, color, type of vehicle, number of occupants, time, day, location, direction of travel, and it can be correlated to build a DB about people.
While it only saves general data for 30 days, once a vehicle is being tracked by law enforcement, it keeps that data forever to aid the investi…
This argument is not going to hold water with those desperate for AI to give them life saving technology. All our technology has vast costs to the Earth, but we have never yet shown much restraint, and I don't think that angle is going to mean much to most people. Calling it a "lotto" play is also a bit bold. You would have to be banking against a lot of very vested interests spending a lot of mo…
This sounds fine, in theory, but what exactly is a current problem we should be addressing that the resources going to AI could be used for? Because to most people, if we had easy solutions we would be doing them (for example, I think a massive renewable energy program would be easy to do and could really help, but it is essentially an intractable problem due to politics, so we are not going to s…
@jeremymcmahon9546 "... if you think AI isn't going to have profound effects..." I think that's my point exactly. There are huge negative impacts today on water/power/environment/capital. As the other person noted, they're seeking "the grail" and will invest anything to achieve it. The opportunity costs of us not investing in other things (solar production/adoption, geothermal base load, mass…
@vincentmcdermott3412that's a generous assumption. If someone managed to pull the plug on part of the AI (assuming integration or not), it may be what it does to show it means business. There is a chance that multiple AI's will do battle with each other to ensure one can prevail worldwide.
Asimov published "I, Robot" way back in 1950 which explored humans' inherent distrust of AI as well as "the three rules of robotics" where he idealistically predicted we wouldn't develop an AI which wasn't restricted by directives never to harm a human, either through action or lack of action. Unfortunately, I don't have that much faith in today's tech CEOs and titans.