Browse Comments

i test a lot of stuff but Winston AI always gives me peace of mind when checking for plagiarism after humanizing content

Very interesting guy, not what I expected at all, very thoughtful and lucent. I read the transcript of the conversations he had with LaMBDA and found them fascinating, remarkably different to any other AI interactions I'd read. Google shouldn't punish this guy they should promote him!

Training your AI on the entire internet is like pumping nuclear waste into your water treatment plant.

2008 was supposed to be the "once in a hundred years" type downturn. I fear the economic calamity that will be coming 12 years from now (perhaps induced by climate collapse?)

I am a lecturer of computer science at a British university, it is frightening how many of my students think they can just use ChatGPT to write their assignments, one of them even asked us about how they should cite 'AI' using Harvard referencing (I'd also like to point out that of the papers or sections of papers we've flagged for AI, none got higher than a 3rd and several actually failed) I'll…

The fact Tesla can still sell its product as "full self driving" really shows the American regulatory system has failed.

>the technology is not as accurate as tv shows would have us believe. Project Manager: We're going to make a facial recognition program. Programmer: Okay. Project Manager: So we put in a photo and it runs through a database trying to match it to existing reference photos. Programmer: Cool, cool, I'm with you. Project Manager: And while it's processing that, it should flash a bunch of othe…

To me it seems like Chat GPT and other AI tools are on its way to change how we live forever. And content creators are not an exception so if you learn how to use these to your own advantage (and especially if you use it combined with Famester), I feel like there is no limit for a person. I am trying to do something similarly last few months, and it's going great for me so far.

*This specific post has been removed and anonymized. Whether for opsec, privacy, or to limit AI data scraping, [Redact](https://redact.dev/home) handled the deletion.* wine long label innate aware point automatic crowd gray attraction

"If AI art is so easy, why not just do it?" Because I was born with a soul that craves to be seen in ways that cannot be found with a text box and an algorithm.

Here is a quote I got from chatGPT itself when asking it about the shoggoth comparison "AI is not and eldritch being. It is humanity’s reflection scaled up, sped up, and stripped of emotion." Truly terrifying edit: For some reason I got a shoggoth confused with Yog-Sothoth which was incredibly dumb of me, I have edited my comment to make more sense within the context of this video

I expected the robot to emerge from the car and be like: "What the heck, cowboy?"

Hi Professor Hawking, I am a student of Computer Science, with my main interest being AI, specifically General AI. Now to the questions: * How would you personally test if AI has reached the level of humans? * Must self-improving General AI have access to its source code? If it does have access to its source code, can self-improving General AI really have effective safeguards …

When an artist displays his art publicly he consents to human analysis, praise, criticism, mockery, misinterpretation etc. The artist does not consent to a company using his body of work to train their AI into being able to mimic his exact work. It's worse than a copyright infringement since AI kidnaps the artist himself. And this is absolutely unethical even if the artist is long dead. You can u…

1:11:01 This is where Soares and Yudkowski completely lose me. The biggest dangers of AI happen way, way before the (completely hypothetical and perhaps impossible) independent superintelligence. Humans using AI to do malicious things is a much more imminent and probable threat, and we should be focusing our efforts there rather than a made-up sci-fi scenario.

Funny that you mention sarcasm. Sarcasm detection is an AI task - here's [an example](https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.06151v1). Of course I'm not saying computers could keep up with a smart human, but it's a topic under research.

I'm a lot less worried about AI models' "intent to misbehave" than I am users willingly turning over their autonomy and critical thinking over to the machines.

Basically, the robot was not programmed to be suspended by its shoulders. One light sway and it tries to correct its balance, and that turns into this, a never ending cycle of corrective maneuvers to stay balanced

“Automatic cars do not need to be perfect, they just need to be better than humans.” - CGP Grey

THANK GOD. Finally I'm not the only person talking about this obvious thing. Seriously, if NO ONE HAS A JOB, no one can buy the crap corporations are making with AI.