Browse Comments

Seriously, I know the cyberpunk artists didn't have confusing facial recognition in mind when it became an art style but it's almost clairvoyant... an act of social rebellion (rebellion against surveillance) becomes a fashion tend.

I don't understand how the headline is connected to the research. Herd immunity comes into play when people have had covid already. This research is specifically on people who never had a reported case of covid. They are only trying to prove that there might be way more cases of covid than just the reported cases. Edit to add more clarification: Herd immunity would be tested of people who recove…

It’s almost impossible to see a therapist. My experience is they aren’t accepting patients and it could be for months. Or they don’t take my insurance or the copay is outrageous. And there are only a few around in my area. It’s a joke. If AI can meet the needs and it’s imperfect, who cares? It’s better than an unavailable therapist.

For a second, I thought “people like to drive in video games. Maybe we could have a remote drive center where-“ and then I immediately stopped myself because I remember how _I_ drive in games. I would trust a remote driver *less* than a robot.

These layoffs weren't because of AI, it was a convenient excuse for inept CEOs to avoid taking responsibility for massively over hiring during the pandemic.

They keep using words like “navigate” and “opportunity” while half the population is getting automated out of relevance. The only thing this interview confirmed is how disconnected the elite are from the fallout they helped create. If you want the real blueprint for what’s coming, go read 12 Codes of Collapse. This stuff isn’t innovation anymore, it’s orchestration.

Robot: "my max speed is 20 mph, you have no chance to escape me" Me: *Gets in a car"

Reasoning models do NOT make their inner workings external to us, rather they create an extra layer of "inner working" that is visible to us and typically increases the AI's performance, but the basic layer of inner workings is still just a jumble of anywhere up to trillions of trained parameters. Edit: after I made this comment, I was made aware of a paper that was published about "Reasoning Mo…

It serves the function of communicative/expressive medium and therefore, it is art. It has an author and not just a commissioner. Commissioning an algorithm to generate noise that was reverse engineered to look like something a person made, is simply not art at all.

I've self-published on Kindle. As you might expect, Amazon's automated approval process is the digital equivalent of a blind man firing a machine gun. 9/10, if you ask Amazon for a manual review then, unless your book contains obviously illegal content, Amazon will approve it. Whinging on Twotter might speed up the process if you have enough of a profile.

To me, solving alignment means the birth of Corporate-Slave-AGIs. And the weight of alignment will thus fall on the corporations themselves. What I'm getting at is that if you align the AI but don't align the controller of the AI, it might as well not be aligned. Sure the chance of human extinction goes down in the corporate-slave-agi route... But some fates can be worse than extinction...

We've been in this era for a bit tho right? Bc I swear I read somewhere that all those Iranian schoolgirls our military "accidentally" killed was bc of some outdated maps they fed to the AI they used to plan the strikes??

AI can replace doctors, engineers, programmer's everyone But i want AI to replace police and politicians 😂😂😂

I honestly feel bad for the younger generations. It must suck not to know whether it's worth pursuing a subject professionally or not because it might get flooded by AI at one point.

They act as if feeding prompts to an AI is somehow any different than giving prompts to an actual artist you hired to make a commission for you lol.

This isn’t how continuous development works, you think a company like OpenAI wouldn’t have savepoints or even save their training data in a different way?  These are valid points about the quality yes, just not buying the other part.

After the dotcom bubble there is still .com in existence, and so it will be with AI.

Correction: 4:06 I say that the difference in fits between the training dataset and the testing dataset is called Variance. However, I should have said that the difference is a _consequence_ of variance. Technically, variance refers to the amount by which the predictions would change if we fit the model to a different training data set. Support StatQuest by buying my books The StatQuest Illustra…

Nothing like a reporter with expertise in their subject, and being gifted with the communication skills most experts, media, and nerds rarely achieve.🎉❤

Oh my God that guy is so naive and this is like the beginning of every horror ai movie.