Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
The AI specifically said "For cleaning". I do not read "for cleaning" and go "Oh…
ytc_UgyYQ0DvG…
G
Just like in the movie, someone heading up "predictive policing" is actually the…
ytr_UgwJxZ-VC…
G
AI spends a hell of a lot of time prevaricating when it's pressed. That's what I…
ytc_UgzeX1H17…
G
Very good idea! The scope of the AddOn could go beyond Ecosia only, I don't thin…
rdc_f5tjl7k
G
From this portion of the video, all he is saying is that there has to be a good …
ytc_UgyWxSUtV…
G
Pure sensationalist, For an expert in the field he keeps portraying the current …
ytc_Ugws2PRX3…
G
Hey shun, thank you for this video and for sharing your opinion.
I agree with y…
ytc_Ugwk28rqF…
G
Question about how different/novel this situation actually is.
Lawyers often ha…
ytc_UgwmiXz87…
Comment
I think using AI to try and "explain" religious debates is pathetic. Religion is inherently HUMAN, we made the concept, and only we as a species have evolved to the point to question from where we came from, and it cannot be stripped of it's natural identity. AI has no place whatsoever to be debating on subjects we, as humanity, should be figuring out ourselves. If we want to know what the answer is, we cannot and will not rely on AI to do it for us.
Whoever says that all human debates on religion are aggressive and always have a form of bullying, either have not participated in an emotionally intelligent debate or has not listened to one. Just because your sources and past experiences are wrong and undeniably rude does not mean all are like that. And in no way, no country, no shape or form or idea, should our conversations be dumbed down into an AI debate.
I only clicked on this video to see if anyone would stand against AI being used, but I was unpleasantly surprised to see everyone praising it. I am dumbfounded.
youtube
2025-11-08T19:2…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | developer |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | ban |
| Emotion | outrage |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgywbTQnDqhl4ohQcSF4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxvvPuK3IfF81EVkNN4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyuLdhrOeWC0zPmYTt4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxkBr0ezCsNi3AaE554AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx0sDLzjIu66kWBoZt4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxhGFmA0XIuTLKtRYB4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxEHuTz5PI38J89vjd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyXT7IhaRay0V32KmJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwGxpcL71F6Bt0wmgd4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"regulate","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxfXU34O9PNUSoJ0SB4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"}
]