Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Also, if either Korea nukes each other, wouldn't they suffer from the nuclear ra…
rdc_dkzqi4n
G
Corporate adoption of ai is 10 years behind . This whole story is literally imp…
ytc_UgyOStFSL…
G
I feel like scrpited videos aren't a perfect analogy, since people do watch and …
ytc_UgwhBco4e…
G
Ok answer this…All AI is code the same code that was in the first computer so ho…
ytc_UgzSjC3LL…
G
If they’re making more money than ever thanks to AI yet unemployment is 20%, how…
ytc_UgwY5eh6t…
G
That's a brillant quote: "you can't keep up with the speed of development, it's …
ytc_UgyBzeN9J…
G
Part of this stems from pulling data from the internet. The other part is statis…
ytc_UgzH444tL…
G
According to wikipedia, [the US' *territorial emissions* (2014) were about 16.5 …
rdc_eudmlp3
Comment
Question about how different/novel this situation actually is.
Lawyers often have _human_ assistants -- junior partners, paralegals, interns, whatever -- to whom they farm out case-law research tasks, right?
You mention "placeholder arguments". I'm guessing this means you'd say, "assuming I can find a case-law citation saying X, then..." and then you'd write a few paragraphs of argument based on that, and meanwhile your assistant is burning midnight oil searching for a citation to fill in the blank. Am I close?
Well then... consider a situation where one of these assistants screws up -- either making the "human error" of misinterpreting a case, or less understandably, deciding to just fabricate something real-sounding to satisfy your query.
And then you include that in the argument you present in court.
And get called on it.
Q: How does this situation differ from one in which the "assistant" is ChatGPT?
youtube
AI Responsibility
2023-06-11T05:1…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxGo27u7ONF6cXfpeJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzL3NIefV2bWDtN2At4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw3y-DofzAmDHY2cIJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwmiXz878yGbZ9fhcB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzP2zFRbYxRoPP5KvR4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxLXb5GQQIMwfQI9NJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxLOgVgADR38zbjT114AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwCLFYV-TO_2XIMZwJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwpoE099XWtdDJewIV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzyJvsWH7ku0atYvXB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"none","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}
]