Browse Comments

7% of ChatGPT users are paying for it, and they are spending more in tokens than what they pay for their subscription. 93% of their clients won't spend $15 a month on it, and the power users who do have a subscription, are costing OpenAi up to $30,000 per month. Google is charging $25 a month on theirs, and it includes the entire Google drive suite. There is no path to profitability for Opena…

And yet, they do need somebody else to stop them. AI is already heavily impacting new grad hiring. We're still at the very beginning. It's crazy how many people write off AI when we're just a few years into this burgeoning technology. And the capabilities are accelerating while still already being the fastest-adopted technology in the history of humanity. Without global regulatory alignment …

I would have agreed with you a few months ago, but Claude is jawdroppingly good now. I've changed my entire workflow around using it now.

AI has already caused immense damage. Algorithmic media recommendation systems designed to maximise profitable behaviour in users is a very current example of misaligned ai at scale. LLMs are already used to poison political discourse in the public sphere where the appearance of a groundswell of opinion supporting whatever you like costs pennies to produce. There’s a total epistemic crisis …

> The model, code-named Avocado, outperformed Meta’s previous A.I. model and did better than Google’s Gemini 2.5 model from March, two of the people said. But it has not performed as strongly as Gemini 3.0 from November, they said. > As a result, Meta has delayed Avocado’s release to at least May from this month, the people said. They added that the leaders of Meta’s A.I. division had inst…

This is the only way large tech companies can remain profitable, with reasonable levels of debt, and still spend multiple billions of dollars on AI, which the market is basically forcing them to do. These companies have been around for a while now. They cannot grow at the rate they were used to, and some of them will cease to exist in our lifetime. If you're at a small/medium tech company build…

In 20 years we’ll hear a repeat of the “COBOL Story”, where the now-retiring pool of pre-vibecoding engineers gets smaller and smaller and there is a desperate demand for people who actually understand How Things Work ™ to please please come fix our system because it’s too expensive to have an AI rebuild it but actually it’s just too complex and we cannot figure out how to feed all the business r…

Comment section is either made of: 1. Loud minority whose brains are addicted to AI and can’t take any sort of criticism for the LLMs they are addicted to 2. Bots set up by AI companies to also try to control social media when AI is criticized

AI chats in court are a legal minefield now. One judge says no privilege, another says yes. Wild west vibes.

Don't wanna be an Anonymous Indian Don't want AI under the new media And can you hear the sound of my video? The subliminal mindfuck in stereo

unable to read a room, build trust over a coffee, or handle the one thing AI can never prepare you for—being told no. Most people just want to do their work and go home, get their paycheck not deal with office BS tbh like yeah people shouldn't be a dick in the workplace, but the expectation especially for Gen Z they just wanna work, go home, get their money and that's it.

>I don't expect it's without Silicon Valley's overlords approving. I don't think US tech companies or the US government have the power to stop this. The whole industry is having a leopards eating face moment for their support of Trump as the EU now views US tech companies as a supply chain risk.

Technically yeah.. If I remember correctly he filled it in the District of Columbia. And they have anti-slapp laws.. But more likely he’ll drop it or a judge, well before anything gets out that isn’t already known..

The hard part isn't deciding if they deserve rights or not, the hard part is determining if they are actually conscious. If a robot actually is conscious and feels emotions and pain, then they should hold equal rights. If a robot feels pain but not emotions such as animals, then they have the right not to be tortured just like torturing animals is sick and illegal. If a robot feels emotions but n…

What if you accidentally fell in love with a girl in your school who keep telling you she's a robot but you didn't believe her thinking it's a joke then you figure it was the turth.

At this point I'm just waiting for the 'Pre-Crime AI Analysis Agency' to be announced. This timeline sucks a fat one.

I'll imagine at least a couple of people will be upset to hear that things like what data is put into their algorithm will bias the outcome which is a very easy concept to grasp, like the chemicals in a reaction will narrow down what products you possibly get or how different fuels to a fire can impact the heat generated by the fire - like I could only imagine disagreement there if getting biased…

I'm so fed up of all these "scientists" having their Oppenheimer moments after the threat has already been created. It's exactly what that character in Jurassic Park said : "so preoccupied with what they are doing that they didn't stop to think no if they should" -- and now they come and spread all this panic. Like shut up already. If humanity dies, it's on you and the greedy corps you helped fee…

7:20 - the way they've programmed "umm"s and stutters into ChatGPT's voice to make it sounds more human is pretty impressive yet eerily convincing

John is a gem of an interviewer - one of the best ai interviews I’ve seen. Great discussion guys.