Browse Comments

Or smart watch, or smart glasses, or voice activated ear buds, or well its China. Its one of countries were one exam can make or break a kid. So hiring three people to sit in a van outside prompting AI, while they message answers to someone standing in an opposing window to the class room. Who will in turn give hand signals. Its plausible.

This is what I worry about when people talk about using ChatGPT for therapy. It can give okay general mental health and relationship advice comparable to what you'd get if you Googled "anxiety reduction" or "friend breakups" and clicked the first result. It can help people clarify their thoughts in the way a non-professional friend who is a good listener might. But it doesn't have the perceptive …

it’s something i’ve been realizing about people ever since this whole LLM fever dream started - people will expend enormous amounts of effort and resources in an attempt to save effort and resources. OP, learn to write your own goddamn emails.

He said off rt 13 later, I assume the first was a typo. Either way AI are awful with abbreviations and even if it were a human of they weren't local they may not be able to locate the store OP is talking about if the address is not route 13.

I hate that trump has fully normalized making up people and then attributing comments and opinions to them. But . . . If you can't beat them . . . Anyway, a very prominent partner for an AI company recently told me they were trying to rinse the crust of their own semen from the corners of their mouth when they realized no one should ever use AI for anything important because it is flawed and …

I wrote off my original suspicions thinking that OP swore off ChatGPT *before* writing this post lol

I’m confusion. AI replaces millions of jobs -> people become poor -> sales and revenue drop -> ??? How is this supposed to work? UBI? Or do billionaires just keep trading among themselves and we get stuck in eternal stagnation?

Only one for deep learning. Then you have Turning, McCarthy and Minsky that is behind Artificial intelligence and Universal machine and the Turning Test

99% of the headlines about AI on this sub are outright lies in one direction or the other and people eat it up. In this case, "opting to use nuclear weapons" in the headline is referring to just threatening their adversary with the potential use of tactical missiles. Combined with the image, it is clearly written to paint the picture of a strategic city-destroying nuke in the reader's mind, despi…

These old companies blowing everything on ai while their product rots and decays are ripe for overthrowing. Yes, facebook has amazing user-capture, but people are using it less and less per day, eventually a much better product will be able to sweep in and do what facebook is abjectly failing to do - make an online space for people you know to be together.

Nahhh, for some reason I can tell if an email is ai generated or not especially if you know that person’s writing history.

Yeah but at least then they had to get real pictures from *somewhere* that you could just reverse image search and find the origin of. The messages they sent were also usually obvious scam copy-paste nonsense like "hey baby you wanna see my pussy? Click \[deadly link\]." Anything more complex than that required taking or at least doctoring real pictures and sending real catfishing messages back a…

People who think men have a monopoly on "I'll just get an AI partner that will put up with my shitty personality traits rather than get my shit together and be a sustainable long-term option for a real human being and because I don't want to accept an imperfect flawed human being" clearly haven't spent enough time around women. This is a *human* problem.

how is this robot hot? I don't see it,all I see is a face with a artificial intelligence

I think the real fear and debate is, "what if a generation of robots could displace humans as an apex species?" Rights aren't really given to anyone. Sure, the group that domintes all and asserted their rights may agree to distribute these rights. In truth aren't we really showing our fear of being usurped from our peaked pinnacle position when it comes to the AI philosophical debate?

34:08 the problem is that AI eliminates entry level jobs before people can develop skill to become irreplaceable artist. Basically you need to somehow develop yourself as artist and sweep floors for living while ai does artjobs that you could do to develop yourself and earn living. Basically humans are left with labour, and only priveleged people, nepobabbies etc can do smth like art cause they h…

This is why I'm so afraid of posting my art anywhere like what am I supposed to do if it's stolen?! It makes me beyond upset art is one of the only things I really have or am able to do, and knowing that me sharing those hours of hard work in anyway could feed some AI trash so somebody can type it in and get that same work back for free seems the same as handing the person ready to shoot you a b…

I used ChatGPT for help on a college paper and when I asked it to make a list of sources, it would list a bunch of sources like: " "Canadian History and Indigenous Relations on Film," Toronto Journal of Sociology, Issue 294, Pg. 36-54, 2004," but every single essay written like this was completely made up, sometimes even the journals didn't exist. I can't believe lawyers would do so little due di…

What motivates ai evangelists anyway? Do they think ai will get them to heaven if they get enough people to use it? Theres no reason to troll the internet telling artists to use ai.

Some clarifications, which most are obvious but I'm putting here just in case (there are probably typos, so ask me to clarify even more if something I said wasn't clear). But first, here's the most important one (I think): at 22:10 - no, I do not think that'll be the case. I say "I don't know" at 22:47 because this whole time I was trying to get into the head of all of these other individuals …