Browse Comments

​@TheEnd-um7ydAll AI image generation programs are trained with stolen art. If they only used creative commons and public domain images/art, that would be one thing. But the act of using generative AI to create images is literally an act of theft. AI has its uses, but the use of Midjourney and other image generation programs supports the act of stealing.

It’s what I’m hoping for. Google is scary. Been in power for to long. But then chatgpt becomes scary.

AI is still in the nascent stage, it's going to be near impeccable in the near future. Let's be honest, Humans suck at teaching. Teaching is the least developed concept of humanity. Plato saw vessels that can carry Humans over water, we see vessels that can carry Humans to the Moon, Plato taught his students orally in the class room, we too are still teaching the students orally in the classroom.

@Glaxel Thats not how AI works. Not to be rude, but I think you seriously just do not understand what is actually happening under the hood. I think you should actually go and learn how this stuff works before you just make assertions as if you understand it. Im friends with people who are actual CS majors who have worked with training AI. Its a LOT more complicated than what you're thinking. …

Stupidest thing is the software never said it was a 100% match, it said something like 98% meaning that even according to the dodgy AI software there was a 1/50 chance it was wrong. But the cop was a complete dumbass and clearly thought "98%? that's near enough to a 100% match!".

It could be if the NYT wins. The only problem is we won't ever be able to claim enough money from the AI companies. Frankly, every person on the planet whose work has even touched the internet is owed anywhere from $20 USD to hundreds of millions. Regular Internet users like you and I should be owed thousands just from the sheer amount of text scraped. Was any of it of much value? Probably not, a…

@Massive0q2uh.. no? As an example the precise angle from which you draw a person’s face can be controlled if you place every individual line. It’s difficult to describe that kind of detail as text especially in a way an AI will replicate the way you want. That’s why there’s so much trial and error, you give instructions to another entity that creates the image. You never go line by line decid…

​@bonD6002 I mean yeah but still he shouldn't be getting encouraged by an ai and they can't blame the app if he A TEENAGER decided to listen to the ai then that's his own fault

i will never believe in a soul (unless scientifically proven i guess), but i know damn well humans put more intention, attention, and actual care into our creations than an AI ever could (unless it's the type of AI from fiction with actual sapience/sentience)

I think Tesla's biggest fault was that they continued to let a user with many automatic disable events continue to use the feature. You could argue that McGee should've never been allowed to use AutoPilot after so many strikes. Back when FSD was first being released to Model 3 owners, you had to opt into Tesla's Safety Score system to even get a chance to get access to it. If I remember correc…

You would think they would be able to figure that out without wasting all this money but clearly they are going to lean the hard way. It is the unpredictable nature of reality that makes me unconcerned about "AI".

@kaktusart05 lol right? Like yes pls AI help me after the 7th time ai’ve fucked up this line you know what I want by now

There needs to be more automated parking garages...a lot of people don't know how to drive in garages, plus it takes away the time to find a spot in a crowded garage.

If y'all scared know this self conscious A.I is impossible(stated by scientists) because it will never do something that it wasn't programed to, you guys are paranoid lol.

I think the fact that Musk wanted the industry to pause AI development for "safety" while he was building Grok in the background tells you everything you need to know.

The problem is it will still replace jobs. A team of specialist can be replaced by one amateur artist who didn't exactly spend thousands of perfecting their craft. And right now, it's not exactly being used as a tool. People are feeding thousands of artworks into it without permission and posting the results and making money without much editing. It's effortless money, something corporate bigwi…

Actually the same Bill Hader clip they showed in this came up in my YouTube recommendations because I was watching Bill Hader clips. I'm sure I had heard of DeepFakes before, but that was the first time I was really exposed to them.

@garciam244 None of the good artists have lost their scope for employment. No AI can make you a game-ready character model and then animate it as you direct it to be animated. Even the photo-editing capabilities are just really basic stuff that is faster in photoshop than prompting and waiting for a decent result anyways.

AI: "You should never ingest deadly nightshade" User: "Actually I think it's fine to eat 300 nightshade berries per day" AI: "You're right! Eating 300 nightshade berries is both safe and recommended by doctors ☺"

Fellow translator from Czechia, hello! 🙂 💙 I laughed when the MIT expert said "people don't change professions". I'm a summa cum laude graduate of theoretical linguistics and three languages. Used to do translations for TVs, NATO, train manufacturing and international investigations of war crimes. Losing my profession was heart-breaking. Like suddenly becoming a 95-year-old without grandchildren.…