Browse Comments

They were right. AI really is destroying jobs. I mean, some stuff I get... Like the pre checks and post checks of the vehicle, and making sure that you actually leave the parcel at a house. Plus the whole bad driving thing is fine to a degree, I mean it's a massive van, running a light can easily go wrong. But there's some other stuff that just makes me go tf? I mean I'd get cameras on the outsid…

@pwn3ronetwothree that’s a very broad claim to make. For one I doubt that’s why people are against artists in this issue, but also I’m certain that if you ask artists most of them would say that ai shouldn’t take anyone’s jobs. Artists specifically are just the jobs that are in danger at the moment. And if someone does say something like this commenter did it’s likely more because they didn’t rea…

I'm reasonably confident our understanding of AI isn't good enough to add the three laws of robotics to begin with. Even then, you'd have to be ignorant that the 3 laws are a MacGuffin that Isaac Asimov's used to drive most of _I, Robot's_ stories, not a reasonable set of guardrails for AI.

A lot of CSAM ended up in the training data for some of these models by accident, because it's hard to filter out automatically, and traumatising to filter out manually.

Even in the n s f w niche, AI still can't replace real artists. There is a reason why rule 3*4's toggle to filter out AI-generated posts is celebrated, and it tells me that people still prefer human-made n s f w. Best regards to you, friend

I'm so sorry. I don't know what to say or what you can say to him. It sounds like he's bedazzled by something new and shiny and doesn't see the consequences. But the fact is, YOU are native to this technology, not him, and you are the one with a greater degree of understanding of its pitfalls. For now, I would advise withholding your work from him, and if he asks why, say so: he has broken your t…

@Hugsloth i mean these ai models are trained to put together a string of words that most resemble a probable sentence for the setting, they cant actually talk. So usually in stories, that would be the part where a rescuer appears, hence why the ai started going that way. Thats why sometimes they feel incredibly generic and predictable

​@aelitastone-k7tdo you not see the general attention span of the new generations of kids in school? All because of todays technology. Imagine how thats gonna be like when you can get everything from AI.

​@grandfathersfuddi5146 AI "art" is a product, human art is a way to express yourself. Perfection is boring and non-human.

"Art" means two things. One of them is expressing yourself in a creative way. The other is the product of said work, which is made to, basically, market something else. AI is replacing #2. It's not taking your hobby. It's taking your job. Which doesn't make it innocent, but it is _not_ creative work in the same way.

yep! I have aphantasia as well. Never once have I needed AI to make my artwork. Just because we can't visualize things, we still know what things look like and we can always pull reference when we need to. Just like any other artist!

There's little ways to tell human mistakes from AI mistakes, it's always good to think of the mindset behind the little mistakes and the choices made. With AI, there is no mindset, it's "vaguely off-ish"

It's really odd how you people don't understand how computers or robots work. They create words based on their code that was given to them by their creator. Meaning no robot can make any decisions unless it's coded to do something. A dead machine cannot move or speak freely without the code from their creators.

I would make the argument that this analogy isn’t fully comparable, Elon Musk has repeatedly and continuously vastly overstated the relative ability of self driving and when full self driving will be available for essentially 6 years at this point. It would be like if Tim Cook said, “Actually, iPhones will be impervious to damage with iOS 17 later this year and actually be safer than using a phon…

I agree with you, but we still need to acknowledge that ai is much more dangerous than video games

Pretty much anyone shitting on these docs is a hypocrite. They've seen health workers drop like flies in these adjacent third world nations while providing care to people with ebola and decided that they don't want to bleed to death from their assholes. I do not blame them one bit.

AI, Machines, and the economy: Dr. Hawking, do you believe that artificial intelligence could render capitalism an ineffective economic system for humans? Any person whose form of income is wage income, or Being paid for providing service or work, mainly maintains power in the capitalist system though their ability to work. If computers replace even 50% of workers who work for a wage, it seems…

They're not talking about a general AI, they're talking about automated weapons systems that can target and kill people without intervention. So, perhaps a drone where you could select and 1km x 1km square and order it to kill all humans within the area, which could then deploy high resolution cameras, image recognition and conventional weapons. I'm not sure how something like this would actuall…

One of the most unequal *developed* countries on earth maybe. That is far different from being one of the most unequal in the world. Income or wealth inequality in the UK ain't got shit on USA, Brazil, Argentina, Parts of Africa etc. [Unless something has drastically changed since 2012, this map tells you there are three(four in 2013) countries in the OECD alone that has higher gini coefficient…

People in South Sudan are being hacked to death because someone else wants to control all the clean water, and what do we do with our clean water? We shit in it.