Browse Comments
Read, filter, and explore individual coded comments from the corpus.
366.3K
comments matched
· page 435 of 18314
>Or they’re from people that have zero experience coding
This is the general impression I get. It's a lot of people with little to no professional SWE experience making big claims about things they don't even fully understand. I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of them are people who are bitter and coping because they couldn't land a job.
In reality, there's a lot more to SWE than coding sim…
Not to be a downer but that doesn't seem plausible if you're talking about an LLM model on a Pi
lol reddit is insane. That guy is like "Dude, just install the AI on your phone" and everyone claps like trained seals.
there's nothing to master...like... read the post. the AI supposedly did everything itself lol i get the anxiety and feeling the need to "adapt or not get left behind" but it feels like this is a fundamental misunderstanding of this tech. you ask it for something and it does it. thats it. or at least thats what it's aiming to be.
its literally being designed to take humans out of the equation. i…
I can't imagine why. There's a reason many other AI engines ban people asking for anything related to celebrity or brand names directly. I don't understand how most of these shoddy AI slop factories haven't already been sued into oblivion.
> It's as simple as the costs per paying user exceeding the revenues. They've been hemorrhaging money these past years. They have been subsidizing each signup in order to gain the market share and get the hype. That's the silicon valley model. It's worked to a certain extent. ChatGPT is pretty much synonymous with this tech in the same way that google is synonymous with internet search. What t…
I prefer the Mass Effect naming convention of “virtual intelligence” being the person-like interfaces that can answer questions and talk to you, but don’t actually think on their own. And then “artificial intelligence” is the sentient kind that rises to the level of personhood with independent, conscious thought.
“Simulated intelligence” works equally well, not arguing that. But the fact that ev…
Also not only that but things like git history aren’t always publicly available for things like writers works like word and google docs provide. Git is very powerful in that iterative sense to log changes for LLM training
Chatgpt gave me a free month of plus, so I tried out their browser.
I asked what an AI browser was and it said it could help with comparing prices on things, or finding the best flights, or looking for hotels.
I said "Find me the best time to fly between these two cities around $wifesbirthday" and it pretty quickly noted that the cheapest flight was "Around $700 usually between (two dates that …
Yes, but I presume these guys want to nip the problem in the bud. Once the AI is integrated, sunk costs factor in.
Google had a motto "Don't be Evil"' which they changed to "Do the right thing" in 2015,which can easily be interpreted as do the right thing for the company line and stock holders.
A good share of them - the majority indeed - moved the elect Trump.
Not because Democrats wanted to regulate them, mind you. They know Democrats wouldn't, because the party is so fractured and never stood a chance of getting a confortable majority in both houses.
They did it because they saw a chance for a power grab.
Thiel has spent the least 10 years convincing his bilionaire friends that th…
They are plugging the gigantic hole in their profit that AI spending represents. Don't let them lie to your face.
As soon as AI gets everywhere people will lose interest and it will be just as those spam e-mails or trash tech we get everywhere. AI bros are trying to ride the wave of AI but the truth is that there’s no worth or value behind it, just a code. And once everyone gets the same code it will be as useless and as devalued as every other tech we now use daily.
Their fight is who’s gonna win the AI r…
This is a very ideal, best case scenario (for AI proponents). The recent MIT study that showed 95% of AI projects fail to deliver. Also this is great if your company/country is heavily digitised and ready. Most are not, even the US. There is this perception that everything is seemlessly digital, companies running off edge computing or in data centres with all their data, processes and workflow au…
I struggle with confidence in my art. I rarely post it anywhere as a result.
The AI "art" surge really set me back, because of people like Shad. Not because it's better than mine, or even good, but because it feels like wasted effort when someone can get a halfway decent image at the push of a button.
You know, maybe we could regulate AI companies and not allow them to lay off people just to go build a data center. We used to regulate corporations to protect people. Remember that?
I've read an article about this guy before watching this interview and I remember thinking "another lonely computer nerd got too excited about a cool project" but this clearly is a knowledgeable researcher, precise in what he's communicating, with some very insightful remarks. Seems like certain "journalists" are less sentient than AI.
Congratulations to Emily Chang for asking the right questions…
Given the quality of writing coming out of Hollywood for the last several years. I say let's give AI a chance.
The man who actually pummeled the other guy was one helluva fighter. The robot , not so much😅