Browse Comments

From the article >Some site owners think it’s a privilege people will pay for, and they are racing to build custom AI models that — unlike the sanitized content on OpenAI’s video engine Sora — draw on a vast repository of porn images and videos. > >This vision for the industry’s future raises a host of difficult questions: How do you compensate performers whose likenesses are used t…

Funny thing is he recently said using AI to promote false things should be grounds for disqualification for running. Trump criticizing Trump lives on

I would bet on Google to win the AI race to be honest, I do already think that they are heavily underrated while OpenAI is overrated. They have the computing power and the money to do so without having to rely on investors and they also have the talent. They're also semi open source and share their research. I did read that they also want to offer their model for free which would be the next huge…

I really appreciate AI to help me with complex ontology issues and workflows that would have taken weeks (albeit, over worked weeks) in the past. I feel it's less matrix mind atm and more knowledge inequality; I know a decent amount about different fields, I also know my fundamentals and studied and practiced the analog versions -- logic, math, philosophy, painting, illustration, etc. Even survey…

This. Management is forcing us to Claude everything and run workflows where basically I just hit a button at this point. Playing Steam Deck and searching for another job while the robots do things.

Don’t focus on the tech. For musk orbital data centers are the ultimate carrot! That is what he wants to come up with for all his businesses - the one promise, feature that people really like but is far away and takes a while to achieve. This gives him the leverage to hype the stock up many many folds. This is what he did with Tesla and self driving, now robots. He did that with twitter and the…

Cool, still sucks. The neat thing about the left is that we don’t just automatically defend bad shit done by our team.

I’ve been applying to jobs for a year now. I’m so tired of writing cover letters. I’ve been letting an ai do it recently, but I’m still so bitter about it.

The issue is now is you physically cant stop AI development. If you develop rapidly you risk the downfall of your own society, but if you dont develop rapidly and say you leave development to countries like North Korea and Iran.. you risk being left behind understanding the cutting edge of AI tech and also how to counter it, in doing so also putting your own state at serious risk. Its going to al…

Anthropic is valued at $183 billion. The $1.5 billion award is nothing to them. The settlement should have been at least $15 billion

I hope that this committee will invite thinkers from all areas of the human discourse and not just scientists, but historians and artists, and philosophers to put their grain of salt on regulating AI - the most important technology in human history.

If the ai is replacing jobs Who will earn and who will buy And ultimately less sales to companies

A concern I have that not a lot of people seem to mention is how generative AI will impact childhood development and education in general. Is it hard to imagine school boards and politicians voting to allocate funding to schools to decide to cut funding to art programs, especially if computers can generate images better than many people? What about reading and writing comprehension? As more kids …

amazing how the first section of "what if everyone gets chatgpt" just literally came true in under a year

I'm with you on ai generated still being a bad tool, even if it was ethical. Great articulated video that covers the topic very well

AI bros act like they aren’t just as easily replaceable by AI. Also, I’m pretty sure AI won’t be “free” forever. There’s a reason drug dealers let new customers have the first taste for free.

I asked ChatGPT this, and it gave the same answer twice, but then it got it right. So I asked what I should comment, and it said it made a mistake and learned from it.

What is the point of this story besides FUD? A kid runs out into the road from behind a car, no human or robot will be able to see that. Why not investigate who let that kid run out into the road unsupervised and punish them?

"just two words: 'not a thing'" says the human. I expect the robot would have known that's three.

The fundamental problem with this approach is that generalities can't be applied to an individual, and these automated approaches to crime prediction only rely on generalities. They are a codification into law of biases and stereotypes.