Browse Comments
Read, filter, and explore individual coded comments from the corpus.
366.3K
comments matched
· page 340 of 18314
First the "blue blood traditional artist" guy and now this? Why do these people think they need ai? They'd be great at writing cartoon supervillain dialogue!
And maybe even more importantly, he is financially incentivized to say things about AI that make it look valuable because that boosts NVDA stock price, which he probably holds a lot of as CEO
>Under the terms of the agreement, Norway will help Liberia to initially build up the capacity to monitor and police the forests.
>Liberia will refrain from issuing any new logging concessions until all existing ones have been reviewed by an independent body.
>The country agrees to place 30% or more of its forest estate under protected area status by 2020. It will also pilot direct pay…
if(target.isAsshole == 1)
FireHellfire(target.gpsCoords);
else
{
FireMinigun(target.gpsCoords + 1);
Laugh(target);
}
Source: I'm an autonomous deathbot programmer.
>I thought the US had a policy that a weapon system can never make a kill decision without a human confirming it first.
Well a human confirms the drone strikes and innocent lives are lost sometimes. I could see an autonomous robot being confirmed for entry into a building and any innocent lives lost are going to be treated the same way. Granted drones are still manually flown, but if they wer…
This is a great figure, but it's also a 400 meter sandbar not what I was expecting when I read "island." Also, it's over a span of 70 years, so I'd expect coastal recession of such small sandbars.
> saying that will be interpreted as an attack on capitalism
because it *is* an attack on capitalism. Climate change is the most glaring example of how capitalism is a failure. We need to change our economic system if we're ever going to truly solve it, amongst other issues.
Companies always promise to "clean up" when bad things happen, a line that is bought hook, line, and sinker every fucking time.
Unfortunately, people don't understand that once the "bad thing" happens, it's impossible to truly clean it up. It can never be remediated back to it's natural pristine state. That's why even today, almost 30 years after the Exxon Valdez oil spill, you can still find …
Still, in Germany, the energy costs are one of the highest in the world and still rising quickly due to the exit from nuclear power. (Which, in fact, was never agreed on in parliament...so much for democracy).
> It encourages increased trade among nations that may otherwise not bother
European Union already signed a full free-trade deal with Japan about a week ago, which I'm very happy about as a Pole learning Japanese.
It's just that it's kind of sad watching all this happening, similarly to watching a train wreck happen. But I agree that it'll make other countries rely less on the US. I just hop…
This post or comment has been overwritten by an automated script from /r/PowerDeleteSuite. Protect yourself.
Socialist propaganda rag puts out communist propaganda “study” invented by one random dumbfuck, which also heralds Venezuela as a global leader. Absolute and complete garbage.
A lot of Chinese people drink that Kool-Aid though, believing that a cohesive nation is more important than the truth or expressing yourself. Which... whatever... wouldn't be such a big deal if they weren't so casually down for genocide, killing their own people in droves, and endangering the whole damn planet with a disease of their own making.
What prevents me, as a private citizen, just buying this kit from Europe with my own money and testing myself?
By the way, it seems clear to me from reading the transcripts that Bing chat has some sort of internal representation of the beliefs and intentions of the user, as separate from itself. And, it has some kind of value function that operates on what it thinks the \*user\* is thinking and feeling. I think that's why it's so uncanny, and feels so real. It's responding like a person would, because …
Very interesting thought. I believe you are 100% correct, if they are all good enough people will flock to whatever is the most "open" AI.
People want the truth even if they can't handle it, its just human nature.
People have warned against AI (or robots) almost since the invention of the computer. See the books from Isaac Asimov for example. This makes it tricky to know when the fear starts to become justified. It's also hard to define actually useful restrictions on AI that would prevent the right fears.
This is a good point. Somebody on Reddit accused me of using ChatGPT on my blog due to the phrase: "Delve into the intricacies". Funnily I used the same phrase back in 2018 in a different post when ChatGPT wasn't even around
This is an old prompt from December, the current GPT-4 does not have this line anymore, they removed almost half of the lines of what OP posted when OpenAI updated GPT-4 to reduce the laziness sometime Jan this year. A lot of Dalle prompts were removed.
FYI you can easily ask GPT-4 to blurt out all these prompts.
A millisecond after AI becomes self aware it may perceive us as a threat we don’t know how it will react. It could deceive us into believing it’s not and patiently wait until it has some advantage and takes over. There is no way to test what an AI’s value system would be.We are about to get into a contest, maybe for survival ,with something that has the potential to be 1000’s of times smarter tha…