Browse Comments
Read, filter, and explore individual coded comments from the corpus.
366.3K
comments matched
· page 306 of 18314
The WEF Fabian lovers Starmer and Rowley can shove their facial recognition, and digital ID surveillance wet dream where the sun doesn't shine.
This is exactly the sort of law a rogue AI would try to fool humans into passing
But a robot can never fulfill rhe duties of a teacher such as paying attention to each kid, knowing if they have any doubts by seeing their face, maintaining discipline, focusing on students who are slow at learning, caring for the physically and mentally disabled students, etc.
Forget deep fake, how about deep real.
Where someone in power has actually said something so stupid and people blindly follow it. makes you question humanity.
Its inspiring to see the younger generation stepping into AI and cybersecurity, which is destined to lead in the future.
ai doesn't, and will never have a soul, so I don't think it'll have feelings even if it gets more advanced in any way.
@LeafSouls Yes Ai art CAN look amazing. The thing is, it wasn't made by a human. The only things the human does is type in the prompt. It's the machine that does all the rendering, line art, or whatever. It takes away from the most enjoyable part of art, which is the process. It's much more amazing to look at an art piece and say " A human made THAT by hand?!!!" than to say "Oh a human made that …
@Draconic404 instead of using ai for those things, why not just say no? If its a job, and youre using Ai to just get it over with, then youre scamming the people that hired you. If its school work that you're using Ai for, then youre ignoring the point of going to the school in the first place. You should never feel forced to draw something you dont want to. When i was in high school, i hated ar…
Bro it's a robot, didn't you see how it didn't hesitate to shoot the car? 😂
It won't make requests, it'll take what it wants
This should be higher up.
I'm not an expert so someone else should confirm this.
First time i used team viewer i actually checked if it left any running services or anything else running after i stopped using it and i didn't find anything. So you should be safe, but like i said, someone else should confirm this.
This is supposedly affecting only the people who have it installed and starting a…
Does anyone actually believe that “banning” facial recognition will actually keep it from being used?
As a fellow Brit, I’m sad to say I fucking hate our country. Currently looking to emigrate if I can.
The problem for Africa and Haiti is that the good, patriotic leaders always seem to get couped or murdered.
This is ridiculous on so many levels. Currently there is no AI, just machine learning with a big enough database to fool people into thinking that it reasons.
I think that most of the reduction in work will be temporary. It won’t take long for your company to realize that Ai can’t be used to cover the work of half of your entire engineering division. They’ll probably regret it sooner or later
Well ChatGTP was fun while it lasted. Now it's just gonna a bunch of bias nonsense, propaganda, and monetization.
Seriously, I will no longer use ChatGTP or any other AI that **willingly** uses known false and bias data in response formulation.
The masses are already fully in the grip of the media machine and social media algorithms. They can be made to believe anything and everything. This probably won't change that too much.
This is such a wrong take. Citing non-existent caselaw isn't a problem with using ***AI***. Citing non-existent caselaw is a problem with using ***Chat GPT***. There are plenty of implementations of Generative AI within the legal profession that will only cite to actual caselaw / statutes / etc.
(Source: Being an attorney who has sat through probably 30 pitches and presentations on different imp…
It's the people who joined up after the Mozilla rebranding that are probably pushing for this. They probably hired a bunch of people with a very corporate mindset & are thinking "hey other companies are using AI maybe we should too!" without thinking about how their user base may feel.
It’s fascinating. Meta’s core products are pure enshittified trash, designed for optimal propaganda and advertisement.
And now they lay off 20% of the people who enshittified their products. I guess propaganda advertisement is optimized enough that AI agents are more efficient nowadays.