Browse Comments

I like that he has a broken arm. Not sheltered. Playing hard... Knows what actual hurt is. He'll be fine.

AI is just sitting there like damn i'm going to consume all the free art

For those who are confused: Sora AI is a ai generative video source where you can enter a prompt explaining the video and sora will make a very realistic video of it. This is very compacting to YouTubers as they can be replaced with sora ai

This, this is one of the reasons we dont want generative AI, not only artists, but any person with morality, generative AI has no good purpose, all the use they make of is inherently evil, deep fakes, sell "art", steal work, black mail, fakenews, etc. I hate it, it should be banned.

Side note that Waymo also heavily uses cameras especially when it comes to the driving and maneuvering, LiDAR is another sensor layer for risk mitigation.

Can we automate a few mcdonalds first and let those workers try art instead. Why aren't we replacing jobs we don't want to do instead of jobs we're already getting pushed out of by tech. Edit: Yall in the comments need to chill.

" Blue blood" is that a new slur for ai "artists" to use against us? Makes it feel like we are freaks of nature because we've taken time to learn and practice our passion

This is what a bubble looks like. People are learning that the very term Artificial Intelligence is a lie. It's not intelligent, it doesn't think and it never will.

I don't know what's scariest between the robot with the machine gun or the one that can drive

Automated Photoshop is all it is. That's how the tech works, pulling out pixel clusters based on the picture's text description and then mashing them together, with some RNG thrown in for variety.

I'm glad to hear you had people to pull you up. It's scary to think that others are falling through the cracks because we're all so isolated now and AI really feeds into that in a bad way by creating the illusion of connection.

You talk like its not ordinary people that running businesses and they only care about money

It would be against our very nature telling them to keep it to themselves. Otherwise, I'd be interested behind the reasoning why.

This is just the illusion of a debate. The article frames it as if public backlash, or Amazon, or any other concerns could potentially keep facial recognition technology from being used & abused by law enforcement. It's all post-fact. They already have it. They already use it and will continue to do so regardless of any public pressure.

Sure we set fire to your homes, raped your pets and murdered half your town... but what are you going to do, vote Demoncrat?

I took a computer vision course in my last semester at uni and our professor–an extremely well-respected figure in his field with a shitload (>200) of publications–set aside half a class session to discuss why facial recognition software is useless garbage that should stay in the research sector. First of all, there's a single application for it and that's surveillance and monitoring. And se…

They’re not wrong, we stole from the future of our young generations as well as the poorer nations.

Worse, catfishing and deepfake revenge porn are about to explode all over the internet while awareness about these software tools is still low.

Can't wait for the realization that the courts already ruled AI works can't be copyrighted.

Fine then I'll talk. 1: The title has nothing to do with the paper. This is not a quote, doesn't take into account what the paper says about the various improvements of the model, etc. 2: The quote used isn't in full. To quote: >Figure 4: Code generation. (a) Overall performance drifts. For GPT-4, the percentage of generations that are directly executable dropped from 52.0% in March to 10.0…