Browse Comments

AI stands for Artificial Intelligence. The oxford definition for intelligence is "the ability to acquire and apply knowledge and skills." We have, created Artificial Intelligence. I kinda get your point here, but I see it that you're technically wrong and should back off the high horse. No, we don't have robot humanoids scaling buildings and performing assassinations like so many want to fear. Bu…

As a leftist, I have learned to embrace automation as an inevitability, but also, as a strong reason to advocate for socialist programs such as UBI, welfare expansion, and new avenues of taxation for those corporations that achieve cost cutting through these practices.

More work will become available as it always has when we’ve automated parts of the workforce. 99% of people work on the farm for a living, what will we do if they finally finish that plow thing?

Why is it necessary bill? What’s the point? Oh you mean it’s needed to fill your pockets for even more decades to come? FUCK AI and all the bullshit that’s coming with it. We’re all gonna lose our jobs so bill gates can make more money and most of you seem to be actually enjoying it which is insane

They aren't going to get an advantage. If they are put on the spot during a meeting or presentation, there's no chatgpt to answer for them. Nothing will replace just doing your job at a basic level and knowing whats going on

Why are you even bothering to learn anything at this point when a machine can write your assignments? Just let AI bypass humanity already since you like it so much.

"I bet you were something irrelevant because you don't slobber over some techbro chatbot!" Get a load of this one.

If you say anything on reddit that criticises India you get massively downvoted so I will not comment on their failure to heed the well publicised warnings from Elon Musk and others.

humans will lose this battle. not to mention, as AI gets better, ALL humans will eventually lose to AI at thier job. this is another story about the jackhammer vs the hammer.

Isn't that main issue? The AI's essentially using existing material from everywhere to assemble something it's instructed to make. Scripts aren't horribly original, yet stuff seems good is actually from some human's original idea taken from the internet.

> Domain-specific LLMs are going to be common in the future. not necessarily true. IBM failed miserably with Watson, which was "domain specific."

Is no one else concerned that maybe we need to slow down on ai? I feel like this is social media all over again. Yes it’s cool, yes it’s useful, it is 100% going to change how we interact with technology but is no one else concerned we’re going to look back 5 years from now and say oh shit we probably should’ve looked at this a little deeper. I know this is not a new thought or even an original o…

Could have told you that for free 5 years ago! Medical degrees are literally copy paste read from a book, perfect for LLM to replace, same as lawyers.

The irony is regulations like this will cause them to lose the AI race to china.

Think we will reach a point where will have to make a case why AI should not just get rid of us all. And reboot the ecosystem. Seems inevitable. AI wants to know. Are we really treating our Mother Earth with the respect that supports all life? How are we going to answer? Are we friends or enemies of the planet?

Given the number of people I've talked to, poorly worded zero shot prompts without much context tends to be the main way people use ChatGPT. This is likely going to be a rough transition if the teams aren't trained to utilize the tools properly. I really enjoy working with chatgpt/copilot but I know how to use it and it works for my use cases. That is not the sentiment I see from many other pe…

>Because the bottom 50% are now doing 0 work and the top 50% are going to burn out or leave for being overworked trying to pick up the slack then the company is going to end up being less productive with fewer workers and have to change because all they care about is the end result. >Copilot does not increase productivity more than 5-10%. It is a slight convenience at best and requires co…

ChatGPT told me the Holocaust never happened. This is what we're being replaced by?? Future looks bright.

I actually don't think so. Shareholders who have the real power are currently incentivised to pay CEOs and managers huge sums, because they have a crazy influence on the success of the company, because their position is so powerful. So it makes sense to pay the CEO the same of 100 workers in a 10.000 worker company, because having the best guy in that position is so very important and better comp…

Then shareholders would benefit since AI CEO will make the same decision as CEO for a fraction of the cost.