Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G If AI bros had their way and all artists quit. There would never be new art, the… ytc_UgxYDI8jk… G It is not a 100% self-driving system yet, so drivers still need to stay aware wh… ytc_Ugz3NHGLw… G I also need to point out, contrary to popular belief, teacher dont just teach te… ytr_UgxNyQdx8… G Here's the problem: if they weren't charging for access, open AI would reasonabl… ytc_UgwKjBhZo… G I think you’re missing a viewpoint here Alex. For someone (or something) to lie … ytc_Ugx8xKozC… G AI is the new arms race. AI has no allegiances. AI is only a mirror reflecting t… ytc_UgyjTow-S… G Alright calling him Chat NDT in the middle of the conversation bout AI was both … ytc_UgzlVJChX… G well i hope ai don't do this with photography because photography is my my life … ytc_Ugw5FmFkD…
Comment
@Wolta You’re leaning on two weak moves here. First, you’re treating “companion” as if it automatically means “human only,” but that’s never been true. The definition is simply “a person or animal with whom one spends time or travels.” Nobody questions calling a dog a companion. If animals qualify on the basis of presence and shared time, then excluding AI just because it’s not flesh is a double standard. Second, “this isn’t the 1700s anymore” isn’t an argument — it’s just an appeal to modernity. Being newer doesn’t make your point true. If anything, the modern era has expanded companionship: therapy animals, online friendships, digital communities. AI companions are simply one more extension of that pattern. So the real test is this: is companionship about what something is made of (biology vs. code), or what it does (providing presence, support, and interaction)? If it’s the latter — and our use of animals proves it is — then excluding AI isn’t logic. It’s just preference dressed up as principle.
youtube AI Harm Incident 2025-10-03T20:4…
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitynone
Reasoningdeontological
Policynone
Emotionindifference
Coded at2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"ytr_UgweAflsw4uIzPaCxzB4AaABAg.ALLCScO8QsjANpbuU6KTsd","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytr_UgzTNh61fpL7m5mxIvd4AaABAg.AL0kdBA8HcrAL27bQvjxN4","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytr_Ugwx3uxh20QzPlD9sVh4AaABAg.ASXbdUikiX_AUBEBJQpdp5","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"ytr_UgwzUyxeTBwOuJQ2DRh4AaABAg.AN_dKICJ1MrAUBDsdV3764","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}, {"id":"ytr_UgwGICXpr6zxxQT8BpN4AaABAg.AKBhcuyAwRJAME6Kgbbyus","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytr_UgzkfNAa_ciwsc2iqIh4AaABAg.AHm94y9HMmsAMKogDyQ5wp","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytr_UgyWbvhpA0iDgh7sxVZ4AaABAg.AHLcbSBb1rfAJC9DHUhzcP","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytr_UgyQH9pBxdSHlu6yGlp4AaABAg.AHLKyTd7wCFAKKWdNWdWqX","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytr_UgzJV5Q1h8I2U9qGZxp4AaABAg.AHCc0aFp9vkAIhwBjwNWTT","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytr_UgzlSUd1mAh6i9urcnN4AaABAg.AH4GyYK70h1ANfYdkEmPHn","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"} ]