Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
This is so true. I talked with ChatGPT as I would professionally and it spoke b…
ytc_UgwZU1gq5…
G
I think there are a few? Unsure though, and I doubt people appreciate making AI …
ytr_Ugx1-pnHv…
G
AI for sure way smarter than human 😂 how hilarious human said could be 😂😂…
ytc_UgzRq3_dE…
G
Dave wasn't even going after him, he literally just said "it's funny how I have …
ytr_UgxRBPjMn…
G
Calling current AI intelligent is a misnomer, they are random number generators …
ytc_UgzDyqbxw…
G
While you are very handsome and well spoken...you are not nearly as strangely pe…
ytc_Ugzxlp6lO…
G
I am disabled, poor (USED to participate in nanowrimo), 100% against generative …
ytc_UgxWqB_Dj…
G
Two things they said that I know aren’t true. I drive between Dallas and Houston…
ytc_UgxEpx6dZ…
Comment
@Wolta You’re leaning on two weak moves here. First, you’re treating “companion” as if it automatically means “human only,” but that’s never been true. The definition is simply “a person or animal with whom one spends time or travels.” Nobody questions calling a dog a companion. If animals qualify on the basis of presence and shared time, then excluding AI just because it’s not flesh is a double standard.
Second, “this isn’t the 1700s anymore” isn’t an argument — it’s just an appeal to modernity. Being newer doesn’t make your point true. If anything, the modern era has expanded companionship: therapy animals, online friendships, digital communities. AI companions are simply one more extension of that pattern.
So the real test is this: is companionship about what something is made of (biology vs. code), or what it does (providing presence, support, and interaction)? If it’s the latter — and our use of animals proves it is — then excluding AI isn’t logic. It’s just preference dressed up as principle.
youtube
AI Harm Incident
2025-10-03T20:4…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | deontological |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytr_UgweAflsw4uIzPaCxzB4AaABAg.ALLCScO8QsjANpbuU6KTsd","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzTNh61fpL7m5mxIvd4AaABAg.AL0kdBA8HcrAL27bQvjxN4","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugwx3uxh20QzPlD9sVh4AaABAg.ASXbdUikiX_AUBEBJQpdp5","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwzUyxeTBwOuJQ2DRh4AaABAg.AN_dKICJ1MrAUBDsdV3764","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytr_UgwGICXpr6zxxQT8BpN4AaABAg.AKBhcuyAwRJAME6Kgbbyus","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzkfNAa_ciwsc2iqIh4AaABAg.AHm94y9HMmsAMKogDyQ5wp","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyWbvhpA0iDgh7sxVZ4AaABAg.AHLcbSBb1rfAJC9DHUhzcP","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyQH9pBxdSHlu6yGlp4AaABAg.AHLKyTd7wCFAKKWdNWdWqX","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzJV5Q1h8I2U9qGZxp4AaABAg.AHCc0aFp9vkAIhwBjwNWTT","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzlSUd1mAh6i9urcnN4AaABAg.AH4GyYK70h1ANfYdkEmPHn","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"}
]