Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G I predict that china is using or will use AI to create a DNA specific slate wipe… ytc_Ugx3oKNgm… G How do you wanna govern a billion people without Ai. Any suggestions 🤔 Think we … ytc_UgxtdWiWu… G Irony is that AI is already watching… but I wouldn’t worry cause it more likely … ytc_UgyGG5Ibn… G at a point we may not even realize it, say a AI generated image of a world leade… ytc_UgxUmdv9C… G There's tis quote i think abt everyday "why would i put in the effort to enjoy y… ytc_UgxXxRhHl… G There is so much misinformation in this video being presented as facts, I feel s… ytc_UgwbrlEiB… G You dont need to do a deepfake to get video of Trump saying something moronic. J… ytc_UgyM92K7I… G Here are the key takeaways from the video “Godfather of AI: I Tried to Warn Them… ytc_Ugz33Xwc_…

Comment

This is my issue with big name science communicators in general and NDT here in this specific instance. He is not an authority on AI or AGI. By any stretch of the imagination. However, because he is a scientist (in a completely different and unrelated field) and a prominent science communicator, there are thousands if not millions of people out there who will take his opinion as truth, despite that he himself has to rely on experts in that field to tell him about it just like a layperson does. The responsible thing for NDT to do here would have been to preface his opinion by clarifying that he is not an AI/AGI expert and telling us where he got his own knowledge on the subject. I'm aware this is a relatively casual conversation, but all it would have taken is a single sentence like "hey, I'm not an expert in that field, but I've spoken to *insert name of AI/AGI expert here* and based on that, this is what I think;" and then the whole conversation flows as normal. If you look into it more than not at all, you find that NDT's opinion is not at all representative of how the people in the field talk about AI/AGI. Even his definition of what AI is isn't strictly speaking correct. This is a bad look for him

youtube AI Moral Status 2025-07-31T02:1…

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	company
Reasoning	deontological
Policy	none
Emotion	outrage
Coded at	2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_UgxDwJxsviz873aqH-V4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzMAIbiee_l3jFVEjZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzU5jflk0VRHvPYeDt4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwEZnAwT_ngVx1ahIB4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwtFThDM9gSq1FbW8R4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxSnfxVBB6Jj3nLBuB4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzVJw3dmB5dftqfhj54AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxqLpIumeTYlfwoiFh4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzIlHya3EIHHQRHJaV4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw6YXAJHzE0jPyb3gB4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}
]

Raw LLM Responses