Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
I'm gonna lock the subject to see if you're clever enough AI is useless but also…
ytc_UgzlM9173…
G
If your willing to let AI rule your life, it will, and it will take you down wit…
ytc_UgxiKjbcO…
G
this is why i hate calling it ai
because it isnt really intelligent
the best the…
ytc_Ugy_LAk-0…
G
I think when people say "its okay to reference right?" they dont talk about how …
ytc_UgzERcXhN…
G
Hank, I'm wondering if you've read up on the other author of this book and some …
ytc_UgzuFNU9Q…
G
Looks like a non-biological evolution. We evolved from monkeys and now the next …
ytc_UgzUVluCA…
G
I think this is why that everybody's freaking out. That we're spending so much m…
ytc_Ugwav4gCj…
G
I had no idea Nanowrimo even had an organization behind it. I just knew try to w…
ytc_UgwY0GFCQ…
Comment
What's the essential difference between hiring a person to create artwork for you versus using AI to generate it? Does the origin of the artwork—whether created by a human, AI, or a combination of both—fundamentally matter?
When considering human-AI collaboration in art, particularly when redesigning original work, several questions arise. From my perspective, using AI seems acceptable because you're still providing the creative direction and human input. This is especially practical for time-consuming aspects like colorizing a sketch or drawing, where AI can enhance your work while you maintain creative control.
This creates a form of human-AI hybrid artistry, but it leads to another question: If hiring another person to execute your artistic vision means you're no longer considered the artist, does using AI tools result in the same loss of authorship? What's the distinction between these two approaches to outsourcing artistic execution?
youtube
Viral AI Reaction
2025-09-08T00:3…
♥ 5
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | ai_itself |
| Reasoning | mixed |
| Policy | industry_self |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:24:53.388235 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgxdL_R0sMZXjFkrgR14AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzCqX3B8DnG_mM8ITp4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxxYl-UjLrN1NF5AKV4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyMev2AzxUe0Me88uZ4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxYDtd_xjjK2fCfdg54AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwsz30BjDLkLarwU4V4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzGlHnjIll1Fgf9yLx4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxqTO6cDdE3KhWLNmR4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw72FS98X_vCQsST8J4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwVA5nk87YoA1o0wTd4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"}
]