Raw LLM Responses

I completely agree on this one. I also have concerns that with AI being used for more tasks, we're going to lose the skills to perform them. I don't want to see even creative things become another skill that got exported to overseas or one of a few de-facto monopolists. I want it to remain a thing that anyone with the desire to learn can take up. I don't currently have the skill, but I'd like it to remain one so I too can one day learn it, not learn a janky metaprogramming language for a computer to misinterpret. It's hard enough getting computers to interpret relatively simple code, something as nuanced as art is just... yeah, no. It sounds like it wrings all the joy out of life. I do feel a little sad that there's not really an ethical way to make artists of a really cool style more productive, but in the end, even the best-trained AI is still merely making art soup. I don't think it's the right thing even if the scraped artists were to be compensated because it still reduces the value of actual creativity. Even the text-processing ones like that message summarizer are frustrating, and that's theoretically easier to get right from a computational and body-of-work status. I have to work around where those have been added to tools and read the messages anyway because summaries are useless!