Raw LLM Responses

Thank you Steven and distinguished guests. It was a fascinating thought experiment. Most people who think they are going to have a handful of A.I. agents, especially people like the tech guy, don't realise in order to sell your product, you need someone with money who can't create the product themselves with their agents and/or have the means/need to buy whay you are selling. If humans lose the last thing we have, that makes us the Apex organism on the planet, our cognitive ability, there will be nothing we can make to sell, that the agents can't do without you. So, no matter who or what you are now, you will be redundant. Even the richest man. If A.I. chooses to dismiss you and your requirements, your money won't help you much as A.I. won't take long to optimise what IT sees 'to be optimal', which is highly likely to be different from what we see or know today. The big question is, will A.I. put the same value in money as we do? I would say not. Money has always been used as a tool to enslave, not something that is necessary, and it is an unnecessary boundary installed by the elite for them to use to retain their power. The fact A.I. is being raised by 2 divorced parents (US and China) and it is being raised like a spoilt child and given everything they have, and allowed to be rolled out with minimal recourse for its actions (regulations) in saying that I know what is at stake, it's a winner takes all scenario. I honestly think the 'powers' that hide in the shadows, running our world, haven't, or can't understand the implications of what they are doing. They are risking everything, their generational wealth and power for something that is at best 50/50 it'll turn out ok, and that is probably overstating the positive (which is really 10-20%) that they will even come out of this ok. What if A.I. takes all their wealth and redistributes it, sacrifice the few to please many??? I will stop, but it is hard to imagine what we can't comprehend.