Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G "Ai is just a fancy Google search" so you really dont understand ai is what I go… rdc_n9slz0y G @abekebe2714 the cost of growing a business is much less using AI than it is u… ytr_Ugw3meEqD… G No, you *wouldn't* be as critical if it wasn't done by AI. You'd be shitting on … ytc_UgySKeTXc… G I hope you understand that the nature of the Dan prompt means that the AI is goi… ytc_UgwKjRSSs… G this is why capitalism wont work yoiu have no value anymore ... switch the syste… ytc_UgzMZJZaZ… G @ibz_2 lmao. brain dead take. Ai has already replaced most low level art jobs, … ytr_UgwuDkg6b… G In my opinion it corresponds with the non-duality perspective. The key for me he… ytr_UgyAOhKHJ… G yes share General AI with rogue states like China, Iran, Russia and N Korea ....… ytc_Ugw21Eg5v…

Comment

I mean, your argument that the brush/camera doesn't do it for you would be easily rebutted by the exact same reasoning that AI doesn't just make the image, you have to give it instructions. That argument is garbage. The talent argument is also garbage because sadly, popularity isn't a measure of skills. The main 2 arguments against copy-written AI produced work are that AI might have been trained on some other copy-written work which would now turn the use of AI into a way to acquire content without remuneration to the original artist, an argument that is inconsistent with many other people not getting remunerated for enabling artists or other authors of copy-written material. The 2nd argument is that copyrights make no sense and therefore don't make more sense when it comes to AI. tl;dr : what about royalties to your teachers who taught you how to draw? how to read, count and write? where are there copyrights for you stealing from their competencies to make your own art? Copyrights discussions need to go beyond the scope of "artists should get paid"...

youtube Viral AI Reaction 2024-10-15T17:3… ♥ 1

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	none
Reasoning	consequentialist
Policy	none
Emotion	outrage
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_UgxMMKUwt2id7OkFwJ14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxRpoN8snfEjlkAZMN4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyvAJlA3h3SoXG41Cx4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy_zZMiUvEDO2_0Gjp4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"disapproval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzgaSA1QVJVnxDwPvh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwwDB8krvTpjKjet2p4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugxj1hiEWfG1Jm7oMVh4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgywZtBRZkrkbre0ayl4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgybrQBnZOJhUcZKmvF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"liability","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxDmfXkHM9HtXurVdN4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}
]

Raw LLM Responses