Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G I love swinging by places that think ai won't replace their specific jobs and re… ytc_UgxAVirb0… G But then they realize another human is looking at them watching an AI observing … ytc_UgyeAwgMn… G It’s not my fault the ai did it without me doing anything but describing the cha… ytc_Ugykra4fy… G YES LANDMINE IS AN AUTONOMOUS WEAPON!! I've been saying it for years! You nee… ytc_UgyDRziKg… G No, it is trained. People are not smart enough to program a car to drive. They… ytr_Ugw7jW1sM… G Is AI the cause or is the political environment, i.e. market confidence the reas… ytc_UgyOW6uEj… G As parents with a depressive child, you should have been there at all times. Don… ytc_UgyahM2qS… G I love how AI images and generated videos always get so much hate but its all ne… ytc_UgxO891ck…

Comment

Parsing the 5 C’s that David Sacks lays out, four of them don’t require federal preemption at all: – Child safety stays local, – Communities control infrastructure, – Creators are already federal under copyright, – Competitiveness isn’t determined by state zoning or speech rules. The only area where state law would directly conflict with AI deployment is compelled viewpoint regulation — which is narrower and more specific than “censorship” in the usual sense. For example, a state could define “algorithmic discrimination” so broadly that a model is legally required to generate certain outputs or phrase things in a particular way to avoid liability. That isn’t classic suppression; it’s compelling speech to conform to a legally preferred interpretation. And here’s the key point: solving that compelled-speech issue would not alter any of the other C’s. It has zero impact on child protections, local autonomy, copyright structure, or America’s competitive position. So this is a single technical policy concern, not a justification for treating the whole AI ecosystem as if all five C’s depend on federal preemption.

youtube 2025-12-09T15:0…

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	government
Reasoning	contractualist
Policy	regulate
Emotion	indifference
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytc_UgzDi12giJh-C6KWE3J4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwgitABTnn013WHDo14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwTfx5DfrfG2maoHQl4AaABAg","responsibility":"unclear","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"unclear","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzjXKaRAdIgj52HvAd4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx1DpZs16Svz6D28154AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxPC28D5IaqxR0kQTx4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugx9r5NESjf36m13Bw14AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugy7wba82aL3QDKX1GJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxbLH8z_4zbHNHJjBp4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxQTRMvSjYRNKg-UkF4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"}
]

Raw LLM Responses