Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
@marsmotionexactly none of the this modern sociological mumbo jumbo talk matters…
ytr_UgwkzLKRL…
G
The news is presenting AI in the most non-controversial way possible. Corey Good…
ytc_UgxweasUz…
G
Sadly, ai will oblitarate artists as we see nowdays, but not now it still needs …
ytc_UgylOw1Dk…
G
I think there’s gotta be a caveat to this. I agree that ai art bad and alot of u…
ytc_Ugy-lGG0w…
G
To be fair, ChatGPT didn't say it was sorry, it said "I apologize" which is not …
ytc_Ugyqs8I0H…
G
I think it’s harder to know that it’s ai and you shouldn’t be blamed when you di…
ytc_UgyfGvsX8…
G
I hope I'm not being that person who's afraid of all the newfangled doodads that…
ytc_UgxibSfmn…
G
thank you Sam, i made sure to make a post/reply to someone on linked in with you…
ytc_UgwSjuEJo…
Comment
I'm not a machine learning expert, but I'm pretty sure the matrix of the neural network is extremely unlikely to regurgitate a persons personal data in any way capable of being gleaned as belonging to a given person.
I mean, technically any random system will output completely coherent information given enough time; but there are so many variables with the bias, the number of input nodes and unless a person's personal story is deliberately trained with back propagation to ensure it learns exactly how to retell the story of this persons trauma, I think you're pretty safe.
So no, your information isn't being remembered perfectly and reproducibly, chatGPT doesn't even have enough context memory to hold more than 30k tokens of data, and my trauma is way more data than that.
Besides, I could care less if ChatGPT even did regurgitate my personal issues, the therapy is worth some random person unknowingly writing a book about my experiences.
Would be fun to read it though.
youtube
AI Moral Status
2024-08-31T17:3…
♥ 3
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | none |
| Reasoning | consequentialist |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | indifference |
| Coded at | 2026-04-27T06:26:44.938723 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgzxLwm0WrNWPJ8vKXd4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyytLZI9-8iRbhrKYF4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzNwj4dsiIlRsTh71p4AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwevZUbLjuR9V1ew014AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzVIinh10SJs8Gpc_x4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyoAoMkuijLGvGkhg94AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugz_IsnZ1HwaPCIpezd4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"disappointment"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwWVnf7_jPiBylGVbJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugw3x94rSoZRjnao3Hd4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"resignation"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxTQg3gAtaYPSaxwFh4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"}
]