Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
There are only two players actively deploy and research in ai in large scale, na…
ytc_UgxKGDXCU…
G
Don't forget artists that's the worst😮💨 I'm a traditional artist and I've seen …
ytc_UgwRbaHXh…
G
In the 70's, the United Defence Department had the technology to view the world,…
ytc_UgwDWJI-n…
G
Bro all you gotta do is switch stuff up, make the essay a bit shorter and less f…
ytc_UgyOsQB5q…
G
Wait wouldn’t the ai get a critical mass of unbiased data sets after a while of …
ytc_Ugy6lbrh7…
G
*THE WORST PART OF THIS VIDEO IS THAT YOU WROTE IT WITH CHATGPT AND YOU DIDN'T B…
ytc_UgzFHdZ8o…
G
PR@@F OF HOW "EASY" YOU ALL ARE = chatGPT 4o - SAME RULES, "SAME" CONVERSATION, …
ytc_UgzmanZSD…
G
I do not want my mind be in hive mind with religious people, I tired of this cra…
ytc_UgxR7dFzo…
Comment
In the trolly problem, if ChatGPT does not pull the lever because it is programmed to not get involved, or to make a choice, then doesn't that mean it would break potential laws? Can someone be held accountable for involuntary man slaughter if they choose to not get involved? Or, say a person in the military decides not to kill a primary target that lead to thousands of deaths, that they wouldn't be court marshaled for that action? Shouldn't ChatGPT, or all AI / LLMs or the variations also be accountable for decision making, since humans are held to those laws or standards? The flip side of this thought, is what if we give the option to make that choice. What are the guidelines or thresholds that push it to do so, or would it be obligated to always form a decision? Interesting video.....
youtube
2025-11-19T23:0…
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | distributed |
| Reasoning | contractualist |
| Policy | liability |
| Emotion | unclear |
| Coded at | 2026-04-26T23:09:12.988011 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"ytc_UgyrzMCzqOmxxK7MBRd4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"unclear","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyUa1oZR0WSNu4l62l4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyY1turGHZMkFLhoC14AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwDMdwtZTUeFcKcWdJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"government","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgzYPCO8MfqDNfWTESl4AaABAg","responsibility":"developer","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugwp42dPIxUGZsFuAyJ4AaABAg","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytc_UgwGqWhiq1NiepsBQEV4AaABAg","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"contractualist","policy":"liability","emotion":"unclear"},
{"id":"ytc_UgxCEs743d79ZhpR9RF4AaABAg","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"unclear","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytc_Ugykt57IWjb88fr7z354AaABAg","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytc_UgyAshD73prvw5s4c1h4AaABAg","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"resignation"}
]