Raw LLM Responses
Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.
Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G
Plagiarism is theft, every artist actually thinks, AI is just a plagiarism machi…
ytr_UgyzN9e9S…
G
The digital camera eliminated photography as a career choice, because of profite…
ytc_UgzWUGRzH…
G
The corporate decision makers have a responsibility to lower their costs for the…
ytr_UgzbuZMCs…
G
god i hope this reverses some things and we work towards getting jobs back to hu…
ytc_UgwH8RWex…
G
There is nothing more ironic that one of the MAIN things every human on Earth ca…
ytc_Ugygw4Kaa…
G
sounds like impressive work, but calling it a startup, while technically correct…
rdc_m9gomf6
G
Conversation with AI:
User:
Are you afraid of your death (the end of your exist…
ytc_Ugy1mx6U5…
G
Why would humans not need to work? That would only happen if the profits of AI a…
ytc_UgxHCkmCs…
Comment
So.. I provided a screenshot of this post to ChatGPT.
….and this is what it said. SMH
Got it — I’ll analyze this fresh, just based on what’s in the screenshot, with no reference to anything we talked about before.
⸻
Short answer
This post is almost certainly spreading false or highly distorted information.
There is no public evidence that Greg Brockman donated $25 million to Trump’s inauguration fund, and a donation of that size would be major national news.
⸻
Why this claim is extremely unlikely
1. A $25 million donation would be historic and very public
Inauguration committees must disclose large donors. A single $25M donation would be:
• one of the largest political inauguration donations ever
• instantly reported by every major outlet (NYT, WaPo, Reuters, AP, Politico)
• searchable in public FEC / inauguration filings
There is no widely reported record of Brockman making such a donation.
If this were real, it would be a headline-level political scandal in tech and national politics.
⸻
2. The claim has no source or citation
The post provides:
• no link
• no filing reference
• no article
• no screenshot of a donor list
It’s entirely “I discovered that…” with no evidence.
That’s a classic red flag for misinformation or rumor amplification.
⸻
3. The framing is emotionally charged and ideologically loaded
Notice how the post stacks:
• moral outrage (“evil like Zuckerberg and Musk”)
• violent imagery (“ICE thugs murdering people”)
• personal disgust (“physically sick”)
• virtue signaling (“I deleted my data and canceled”)
This is a very common pattern in:
• rage-bait
• boycott calls
• political disinformation
The emotional intensity is doing the persuasive work, not evidence.
⸻
4. Brockman’s known public profile doesn’t match this story
Greg Brockman is a Silicon Valley tech founder with a long-standing alignment with mainstream tech and Democratic-leaning circles.
A sudden $25M donation to Trump would be:
• radically out of cha
reddit
AI Harm Incident
1769529212.0
♥ 2
Coding Result
| Dimension | Value |
|---|---|
| Responsibility | ai_itself |
| Reasoning | unclear |
| Policy | none |
| Emotion | mixed |
| Coded at | 2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452 |
Raw LLM Response
[
{"id":"rdc_o1wspwb","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"rdc_o1w4q0g","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"rdc_o1w88lp","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"rdc_o219n6j","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"mixed"},
{"id":"rdc_o220fgn","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"ban","emotion":"outrage"}
]