Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G This is good to do for A LOT of reasons. Even excluding the apocalyptic scenario… ytc_UgxA-m8uc… G @real.zer0.1000 How so? You could switch AI in that story with any other way to… ytr_UgyCuW2Bl… G He never said he didn't want to summon the demon. Now he trains his AI to feed p… ytc_UgxvEtv-3… G Everything in the universe has always started very simple, and grown exponential… ytc_UgxdG0Nt7… G He's not raising a red flag, he's pushing a narative that AI is innevitable in o… ytc_UgxcldSc6… G Well, if they eventually want all cars to be driverless, why don’t we just go ba… ytc_UgyEe5LU3… G People who work for minimum wage cannot keep a consumer economy operating. And … ytc_Ugz7Eq0qx… G He is wrong. Many of the Tech CEOs are pleading for Congress to implement guardr… ytc_UgxZBia6o…
Comment
Do you think he is pushing for regulation as a business strategy, or genuinely a coverall. Perhaps if he is pushing for the whole sphere including openAI to be regulated I could see some sense. Otherwise it sounds like the same loonie ideal of “do as I say not as I do” and he’s grossly veering from a venerable path.
reddit AI Harm Incident 1684274193.0 ♥ 7
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitycompany
Reasoningdeontological
Policyregulate
Emotionmixed
Coded at2026-04-25T08:33:43.502452
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"rdc_jkff6n3","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"rdc_jkfq0gu","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"unclear","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"rdc_jkfgf9u","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"rdc_jkf33bw","responsibility":"none","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"regulate","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"rdc_jkf83ix","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"regulate","emotion":"mixed"} ]