Browse Comments

AI would be a great thing in a society that represents everyone. It's not AI's fault the sole superpower decided to legalize bribery and then the courts made it protected by the 1st amendment to solidify representing the rich instead of everyone forever.

Foreign hires will replace US swes; thats the worry. I bet 100 bucks AI can not replace programmers in the next 3-4 years; however it will significant decrease the amount we need (due to nature of the job). With the current surplus, it will hence get worse.

No they didn’t misunderstand that actually. They literally addressed the possibility of that exact scenario within the article. >>”The report also raises the possibility that, ultimately, the physical bounds of the universe may not be on the side of those attempting to prevent proliferation of advanced AI through chips. “As AI algorithms continue to improve, more AI capabilities become ava…

This already happened to my friend. Some bot used Instagram photos to use an ai that makes her nude or something. They made an account impersonating her as well and I’ve heard this has been happening more and more lately.

Killer problem I think is not the ease to debunk but that exploiting preexisting bias can't be swayed by debunking anyway  "Here's a video of Joe Biden shaking hands with the Devil and murdering the dinosaurs!"

And just like the movies, the kill switch will fail when we try to use it followed by some scary monologue by the AI entity… There’d even be a robot hand wiping the sweat off your brow while listening to the monologue.

Or something that serves as a filter and guardian. If there is a big enough need, people will meet it. Reddit subs are a good example. Some subs are full of AI crap and some are heavily moderated to keep it out - or at least keep the quality higher.

Conglomerates....but family owned and with the top pencil pushing positions often held by family members or selected pawns for various reasons.

Mega corporations ran by nepotism. Dude you think American companies are bad? Fuck some of the stuff that's gone down in SK is downright bond villain level shit.

There are no real images of Taylor Swift getting raped. And yet, an image generator is able to generate thousands of images of Taylor Swift getting raped. This specific case aside, this kind of garbage is baked into the technology. >People have been doing this kinda horrible shit with photoshop for a lot longer than AI. Technically, someone who builds a car by hand over a months is doing t…

Dude, some of those young guys would honestly be better off with robots. Especially if they are falling for all that creepy Andrew Tate and Christian extremist crap. Just let them have their robot relationship and they can leave everyone else alone.

Once again, training AI on public data, even copyrighted works, is not inherently against the law. It's not like this guy was the only person claiming OpenAI and other companies have trained on copyrighted data. The only reason he's being called "a whistleblower" is because he worked at OpenAI and said training data included copyrighted data. OpenAI has said "yes, we trained on it and it's fair u…

I happen to share the same claim that AI companies flaunt, violate copyright laws to their detriment, and they should learn the term contributory copyright infringement, $25k-$75k per work. They also have knowledge about the copyrighted material in their training data. Copyright is not just about the reproduction, it's just about the transformation, it's also about the ability to copy it at all, …

People getting mad at Deepseek for just taking ChatGPT as a basis without permission, when ChatGPT literally took all human creation and art as a basis without permission. Pot, meet kettle.

Anyone working in graphic design saw this a mile away. The only thing to stop ai is lawsuits and/or companies like Adobe loosing money. But since Adobe thinks AI is fine to use...oh well enjoy your free subscriptions to Adobe Stock friends!

Antiwork put it best: "The biggest problem they're trying to solve with AI is *wages*." They want to convince devs that since AI can code, they deserve less money.

All it takes is for ChatGPT to have a bias - and that's just VERY possible to implant - to influence the population that heavily relies on ChatGPT right now. While that's not literal mind control, that sort of subtle influence is potentially worse, because those kind of things are very hard to notice. Remember how ChatGPT was just "Glazing" (A word I quote from the articles) its userbase by bein…

The roo is holding the boarding pass for crisakes. But nobody will notice because it's staring so cutely directly into our eyes (the camera). AI knows how to manipulate humans.

Most companies laying off office workers in Western countries aren’t replacing them with AI, they’re being replaced by cheap labor in India.

ChatGPT can already do this you just need to set up a prompt where it wants to gather information first