Raw LLM Responses

I happen to share the same claim that AI companies flaunt, violate copyright laws to their detriment, and they should learn the term contributory copyright infringement, $25k-$75k per work. They also have knowledge about the copyrighted material in their training data. Copyright is not just about the reproduction, it's just about the transformation, it's also about the ability to copy it at all, in any circumstance. How difficult is it to actually fairly compensate the copyright holders whose data they STOLE, they continue to STEAL, PROFIT OFF OF, without due compensation to the copyright holders? I call them robber barrons, because they continue to exercise blatant thievery, while pretending they're doing the best for the world. AI may be a nice technology, but just because you made something useful, doesn't mean you don't have to pay. Especially if you stole everyone's stuff to do it, which you did.