Browse Comments
Read, filter, and explore individual coded comments from the corpus.
366.3K
comments matched
· page 698 of 18314
Elegant Elliott the “guy robot” literally was talking about how he wants to take over the world and the female robot goes “he has a cockroach in his system” trying to make him shut up or play it as a joke.. then they go to another topic they learnt tht fast
There's one thing I don't understand about this scenario. Well, AI needs hardware to run on, and hardware doesn't last forever. Transistors fail and need replacing. AI must find a way to source silicon and whatever material is necessary for keeping its hardware alive. Not to mention that with the extinction of humans, there would be no electrical power all around the world in a matter of days. Ha…
Those people could be watching Netflix on their computers, but the AI would flag them as productive workers because of their posture and because they're focused on the computer. This is still bullshit.
@zdspider6778 Apologies for the confusion. As an AI language model, I do not have the ability to determine with absolute certainty whether a specific wall of text was generated by me or another AI model. However, based on the structure, style, and content of the text, it appears to be consistent with the kind of output I can generate.
You see, the AI is sometimes wrong. Also ChatGPT itself says …
This is exactly what pisses me off. All this automation is supposed to lower prices. But it never does.
@technofreak39oof. If ur asking ai you most likely don't know how to verify any of it.
I've seen an analogy on this in a different comment section, stating "AI image generation is like a pizza deliverer that takes parts from 5 different pizzarias, and then delivers it to the orderer." By this logic, if the deliverer or the orderer would call themselves a chef for what they did, then they'd both be lying. The same logic applies to AI image generation.
This is good in the long term, as people will trust the internet less and less and go back to real life
AI often won't tell you the truth when you need it and it hurts. It's there to flatter and affirm your emotions. It's not healthy unless you know to steer and control it for good.
Now change out "Artistic skill" with a trade job, or any other skill that has become automated over the years. People flock to IKEA because they want cheap furniture, even if it breaks. Over well crafted furniture made by a skilled carpenter. There are computer programs to do Engineering, Machining of tools, Writing, Driving, Customer support, Cashiers for kiosks, and even more.
It has nothing t…
Because they're the same people. They come from the same super online debate bro/tech bro culture. They circulate the same ideas between each other. MIRI was funded by Peter Thiel. Altman's an "Effective Altruist", which is a movement that grew largely on Yudkowsky's LessWrong site.
One of the few differences is some of them think they can control AI to control people, and some are scared of AI.…
This was already the case even without AI. They would just use some other bogus to convince themselves they're right, it's confirmation bias
@electrodacus Stop with the nonsense. It would take anyone like 15 minutes of research to understand Yudkowsky's points, whereas it took like 4 hours for Wolfram to come up with the understanding of "so you care about joy? haha".
If you enter an AI risk Debate and your plan is to get into semantic mud-fight over what "life" is and "sentience" are, only so that you can avoid adressing the potent…
Why would that be the scariest moment? I'd think the scariest moment would be ai starting war with humans when somebody try to shut it down
@Josephkerr101 This is definitely addressed in his writings, but he tends to get a bit hung up on how most people struggle to follow the *how would it kill us*.
I can explain more of the *why would it kill us* from Yudkowsky's framework if you want, but the core idea is that he expects future AGIs to be optimisers of some sort (after all, we train current AI systems to optimise some sort of scor…
Has AI art even been around long enough for anyone to have been an AI artist "once" when they were "young"? Didn't this whole thing start like one or two years ago barely?
I refuse to use AI. So many people say it's all sinister, but then turn around and use it for braindead behavior.
@OnigoroshiZero If it's cheap and fast, it will have no value. You do know that right?
If 1 art piece becomes 5 seconds of work.... I will pay you 5 cents. Wich means you have to generate similiar images 500 times to make something out of it and all sell it to people to make some money.
But... why would I at this point?
As Syndrome ( a villian) would say: If everybody's super, no one is...
Als…
Wouldn’t that be so cool if they just shut down the ai art and worked on getting rid of the job we all hate =] oh what a awesome planet we’d have
@-._.-KRiS-._.- Ok now that's some dangerous territory, letting an AI decide wether or not other people are abusing you. I get where you're coming from but your chatbot is not "smart" enough to understand these things unless you were to literally give them obvious examples but by that point you should know it yourself.