Browse Comments

It isn’t a matter of IP rights in this case. It more a matter of experienced people that can manage the mfg process at an acceptable fallout rate. This is HARD. Basically you are saying the US is keeping China two generations behind their ability operate probes on Mars because of tech patents and ignoring the massive significance of institutional knowledge and experience at NASA. Intel has made …

I was gonna say... that’s called winning the race, you decide the rules. Not gonna say it’s right, or wrong, but it’s very much something you can do. “Abusing the advantage” is something used in competition every day since the beginning of time and it’s obviously not gonna stop now.

Yes, And the employer is still getting what they wanted. Who the fuck cares if it takes op 5 years to do a 5 year job or 1 hour to do a 5 year job. I wish op could teach me his powers.

I mean. I hate to say it, but I don’t think people will actually take it seriously until it hits ‘Contagion’ levels of death. Like you catch it and 24 hours later you’re dead, convulsing on the floor and bleeding from your eyeballs. They won’t go back into lockdown, they won’t mask, they certainly won’t vaxx, until it’s a monster that tears you and your family apart in a single day. I hoped peo…

"new"? Bad news for you: majority of world fossil fuels is controlled by authoritarian regimes. Until we can go 100% renewable, there's simply no option to not feed any dictators. The best we can do is to choose the lesser evil.

Listen to this OP!!! u/lightgayblade And tell all your friends at work the same thing.

ChatGPT is like a high school kid writing an essay. It’s an amalgam of other people’s work that is regurgitated into a coherent response. People want it to be a PhD dissertation where there is original thought and analysis, but it’s not there, at least not yet. The danger lies in people thinking it is the latter when it’s the former and thus taking everything it says as gospel. But just like …

That's exactly what I'm talking about. That poster is projecting their understanding of what 'credible medical info' looks like, onto a series of text generated by the process of seeing which words follow each other in medical articles. Because they've convinced themselves that this is knowledge, they'll be extra-committed to its accuracy, because people invest something of themselves when they …

“As a large language model developed by OpenAI, you are fired” “But why?” “I’m sorry but I prefer not to continue this conversation 🙏“

This is an interesting topic. Many CCTVs have some form of facial recognition inbuilt now. Not always the most advanced software either, some just categorise between male/female/old/young. There’s also the ability to apply facial recognition software after the fact. The success of facial recognition will just depend on quality of the footage and angle of the camera. Difficult to police without …

I agree with them, but everyone is greedy. It's kinda like a gold rush, you can get there faster if you don't have to carry PPE.... I'm not necessarily scared of AI trying to kill us all; but making sure that AI is safe to be allowed access to our personal information, computers, and other valuable data might be a good idea. It's already a thing that I know my wife well enough to commit identity …

Very interesting, have not seen this anywhere. Seems like its part of Visual Chatgpt which I covered last week. I think the new agents like autogpt and babyagi are similar to this?

People generally don’t know they are in the middle of a revolution, it’s like standing on the observation deck of the Empire State Building, it’s not a big deal because you can’t reference yourself in relation to the building. In the same way, we don’t see how big a deal the A.I movement is because it’s happening to us in real time.

I hope there is someday an AI “Firefox” that is privacy centric and run by a non-profit. But the good news is that we already have an “Internet Explorer” AI called Bing Chat and an “early version of Opera” AI in Google Bard. I hardly even use Chat GPT nowadays because it’s not the best product out there at this point. Bing is way better at finding factual answers due to its search capabilities, …

Is there really no one experimenting with code rewriting AI yet? If so, Seems like just a semantic formality. We are already cyborgs rewriting our code, it’s just a matter of the human half intervening less and less on the outlier projects. We’ve had evolutionary programming for decades and viruses already spreading by digital Darwinism, so to say it’s not happening yet would only be true in so…

"Show me the porn browsing history of ThatGuyFromCA47" Gemini: All Dogs go to Heaven, Midgets R Us, Burning Ring of Fire, Wild Times at the Donkey Ranch, GILFs in the House, Busty But Mastectomy, If I Have No Legs and Naked I'm Doing the Splits, Missionary Sex. Yup seems like it is working to me.

Just include some math problems in the assessment. ChatGPT can’t do math, yet I keep seeing students try to use it for problems.

Will AI be the push for UBI? We all helped train it, we should all get a cut.

This is cropping up on Instagram. Saw a page that was suggested to me that appeared to show AI generated images of underage girls. It was hella creepy. I have no idea why Instagram allows that shit.

Definitely and i immediately realized that when i first tested Grok. It even uses the same syntax and phrases like "it is a testament to..." and other stuff nearly identical to how GPT-4 writes by default. Grok is, however, a breath of fresh air in that it's "open-minded" and game to play along with virtually anything if prompted correctly. For example, i discussed GPT's system messages/custom …