Browse Comments

Dealing with pets is more nuanced though, because an argument can be made that pets are sentient. (In fact, I think it's the prevailing view?) Certainly they don't have the intelligence or emotional range of (most) humans, but they definitely have emotions and moods, and likely have their own inner worlds. (My cat just meowed for me as I was typing this - I think she wants some more attention. I…

And for me, even if the AI somehow managed to be 100% accurate, I still think humans should write the actual filings and court documents. It is a very powerful search engine, but they still need to actually compile it themselves. Assuming the accuracy, I am worried about a world where no one actually understands the law the practice. The whole "vibe" coding thing is disturbing, and if it was ap…

I'm as anti-elon as anyone, but the title is missing a bit of context. The person using grok chose "spicy" as the video generation mode and specifically mentioned Taylor Swift in the prompt. Grok even shows a disclaimer and asks you to confirm your age when you do this, so you know what it's about to do. Not that it makes it any better because it's essentially making deep fake videos with nudi…

I don't get it? there is 5 , 5-thinking, and 5-nano now. they ended their terrible naming scheme. If you need cross check why don't you use gemini/cloude or simple Google search?

>as I thought as before we are an the edge of the horizontal line of the slope You have no way of knowing this. It is pure speculation To add some context, I think the release was partially a run for market share and to reduce overhead. First, they made GPT5 open to the public, and on the web GUI hid all the other models (o1, GPT4. ect). Why do you think they did this? Second, they forced th…

Like 3% of GDP has been invested in LLMs and AI the past year. That could absolutely be a bubble which will have economic consequences if it pops. It doesn’t mean AI won’t be useful long term, it just means the amount of investment and valuation given to it right now is out of whack with the value it returns.

These LLMs are absolute yes-men. It's 100% on him, but the LLM shouldn't always be such a yes man.

Lots of people already think AI taking their jobs is a good thing cause then the government will start paying them for doing nothing. I wonder what kind of naive world view they have where any government would ever do that. And I say that from Norway.

I've been seeing plenty of them on reddit lately. They mostly pop up on advice/question subreddits (since they're the easiest to fit into I imagine) and write responses that read like someone posted the original post into ChatGPT and said "write an empathetic response to this, use internet lingo and slang". Always a few weeks old accounts at most, only active in bursts (they'll write 4 response…

He has a stealth AI startup with the CTO of my company (startup is different than the company I work for, CTO is like an honorary role at my company now). He did a presentation at our company and man the guy is just evil. Like every word out of his mouth just gives you the ick because of how happy he gets at the suffering of others.

"ChatGPT gave me this." Fuck off. I can do that myself if I am looking for useless answers.

on almost all subreddits you are downvotes for saying you use ai to help you in something. especially in coding subreddits

Looking at that food reminded me of the lumpia and pancit my wife always cooked. She was from Cebu, Philippines. If she hadn't passed on October 3rd from cancer, next Tuesday, December 16th, would have been our 47th wedding anniversary. I miss her, and her food.

Talk to the instructor in person. Explain you have done the work and would appreciate their honest feedback, in the spirit of the email they sent. Real non AI work, that you want to know if you are on the right track for.

“an attacker would simply have to have a user open a phishing link, which would then initiate a multi-stage prompt injected using a "q parameter." Once clicked, an attacker would be able to ask Copilot for information about the user and send it to their own servers.” Come on. Phishing?? Fckin click bait.

If children are legally not there, Big Tech companies have less incentive to build robust safety features for them since tech company can legally claim they have zero child users. Estonia wants the kids visible so that Big Tech is legally forced to protect them under the Digital Services Act, regulation forces them to constantly monitor and fix harmful algorithms. Not to mention all the risks t…

‘How good it’s getting’ My guy there is someone in this very post just copying and pasting everything from ChatGPT. Everyone can clock it off the bat. In one year all OpenAI, with its infinite access to resources, has managed to accomplish is getting rid of italics and emojis.  But the cadence is exactly where it was one year ago. The logic and consistency is all over the map. It’s a collectio…

They aren't creators if AI is doing all the work for them. They are just managers.

"Claude Desktop adds file that tells browser extensions how they can talk to Claude if/when they choose to do so." This claim is dumb

In the article they do explain the logic - without human interaction that includes friction and emotional management you can't get the skills required to deal with other people. The article is stupid in the way it equates being social with dating and the way it frames the issue as being about capitalism even though lacking social skills will make people pretty much unbearable in every way, not ju…