Browse Comments
Read, filter, and explore individual coded comments from the corpus.
366.3K
comments matched
· page 478 of 18314
Remind me why they aren't North Korea again? She fulfilled her contract. Why stop her?
Essentially, our current Government is supported heavily by donations from within the mining and business sectors, and reciprocates this via subsidies and policies which favour coal over renewable energy, against the world who is travelling in the other direction.
Or, to put it in simple terms, greed and corruption.
Trump is basically showing America what happens when Republicans actually get to enact their ideas without the democrats keeping them in check.
Republicans are like children, and Democrats are the little plastic thing you put in the outlet.
They get pissed at us for stopping them from putting the fork in the outlet, they get mad, they throw tantrums.
Well, they finally got to remove the pla…
For carbon purposes, tropical forests are often huge sinks of CO2 but equally large emitters of methane. Planned and managed forests just sink more carbon.
I had a vitimin D test about a year ago and had really low levels, so they put me on tablets. It's now levels out, so I'm not on that strength anymore and can just buy them at a supermarket, but I'm never going to stop taking them. I'm sure there are people who would be able to get enough sunshine as their daily dose of sunshine, but I'm struggling to get out twice a week, an effect of my depress…
Because they are encryption keys. If you had a single place to register names for Tor sites, you'd have a single point of failure for governments to target. So instead the names are automatically derived from the server's cryptographic keys, and if you want something remotely resembling a readable URL (say something that starts with bbcnews) you have to generate millions of keys until you find on…
A lot of people misunderstand what these robots are and how they are controlled, they have some AI components that help with its maneuverability and getting from point A to point B, but they are still largely manually controlled
When you can go to war and none of your people die, you will go to war more often.
The argument that ai is less lethal is insane. Yes, it can be used more selectively or it could be used to kill off whole towns. Based on human history, we know how it will be used.
As an American, I missed having a beautiful relationship with y’all, and the majority of it’s citizens do too. Love y’all
Because Fed is propping it up. And its a high stakes gambling game for the wealthy.
Soooo many company's values are basically unhinged from reality at this point.
I think the biggest issue with your post is that you're trying to assign human morals, ethics, and concepts of good and bad onto what would be a non human conscience. There's absolutely no way for us to know what a true AI would consider to be good and bad or if they would even view the world in that way.
You could make a pretty good argument for the fact that simply having an oil or commodity dominated economy is a recipe for totalitarianism and corruption. I think it's no coincidence that petro-states tend to be disasters. Places that have piles of oil turn into Nigeria, not Sweden.
OpenAI realizes that their business is subject to law, and the litigation that comes with violating it.
Google Researchers have already successfully made a Galaxy S Ultra process the whole stable diffusion image generation solely on that single device, and even that under 1 min. So your words are not too far from reality, for real.
No the check AI things work. For example I ran it on your post, and determined that I myself am actually an AI.
Barely has had any impact. The industry uses templates for most contracts and paperwork _anyway_. You are just adding touches based on the case. Trying to get ChatGPT to amend a contract in a favorable way to you is just faster to do it yourself.
For legal research, it is not accurate. Keeps referencing wrong laws and articles
This is sticky. If no law was broken collecting their likeness and they are at least 18 and not depicting csam, then this might be a matter of infringing upon freedom speech. People were always able to make vulgar cartoons. Photoshop has been out there for a long time. All AI is really changing in this regard is the ability for high schools to in minutes with zero skill what what experts with yea…
People have been making fake nudes of celebrities since before the Internet popularized it. Hustler magazine v. Jerry Falwell 1988. Supreme Court upheld that it was first amendment protected. What makes this any different? It's just a different tool to accomplish the same thing.
We want it to be /s but it probably isn’t. I’m sure my grandparents talk-radio is already telling them that regulating AI is part of Biden’s “Woke Agenda”
I don't mean to sound apocalyptic, but we could be staring down the barrel of a future where AI supercharges humanity's worst impulses - xenophobia, authoritarianism, a post-truth "might makes right" dystopia.
Free societies can't survive that path.