Browse Comments

Feels like a scene out of a movie. I can already sense the chill going up the Corporate and MSM spine imagining people fighting for "AI Rights".

Great video. All of this seems very sensible to me. Some AI should not be allowed and a lot of it should be regulated. I might be wrong, but we've heard this "We will leave Europe" too many times. I remember when Facebook threatened to leave, multiple times. Or when GDPR was discussed, there were a lot of companies threatening to leave. Awesome to learn about this new legislation, in the future …

I'm sorry but you have such a wrong take that is just "adapt or die" said in a nice way. AI is not like any other technological transitions, because it doesn't create any jobs, just takes them away. There won't be "artists who use AI", it's just gonna be AI. Artists who only draw for personal enjoyment, and never were seeking any money/recognition/etc, should not be affected by AI. They can carr…

Nothing ever happens that fast. Learn trade skills. Learn to use Ai as a tool. All will work out even better.

generative ai is terrifying. sometimes i think its harmless fun, like (*fictional*) characters on character ai for example? (Even then still kinda freaks me out) but like this is panic inducing

Andrew Yang is the only presidential candidate talking about a solution to trucking job loss, as well as other automation job loss. He is worth a seriously hard look, pull up some of his long form interviews.

⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠@ethanfreeman1106 if the human did any of the work then they would be involved in the creative process themselves rather than prompting the AI to do the creating for them, AI can be used as a tool but people don’t treat it as if it is one and instead let it do all the work for them, also, AI can prompt itself anyways to generate images regardless of a human being involved or not so this …

@ーテイル dude when I say he was a legendary artist I mean he was a *legendary* artist. And he’s basically quit making art now in favor of making a bunch of ai art

A perfect example as to why companies would rather invest in A.I. driven trucks. A shame your uncle spent money so foolishly...but that's his choice.

Because a lot of humans put watermarks on their art. Why wouldn't the AI learn to do the same?

Best part is we technically don't know when that's going to stop being a joke. Like, ai systems PROBABLY won't be able to overpower us in the next 10 years, but if anyone's actually improved the tech that far to prove it, then please let me know We're charging towards a cliff that's PROBABLY still really far away

ChatGPT responds differently to any person. One of my teachers once said his ChatGPT agrees with everything he says, even if he knows it's wrong. Mine on the other hand doesn't always blindly agree with me.

You know that if your answer is not already in the internet somewhere chatgpt has no way to answer you right? Keep that in mind, it cannot formulate conclusions out of its own mechanism

They boast so much about AI and how it's the future and how it's taking down the evil money hungry pretentious artists or whatever, and then go to extreme lengths to cover up the fact they're using AI. If it's SOOOO good and innovative then why hide it lmao

And that he mentioned that the clap-back of praising low-quality, human-made content (less so art) as having a "human soul" only serves to assist the Pro-AI side. The intense emotional reaction of the Anti-AI consumers ends up harming normal artists more often than not, especially digital illustrators and writers, which gives ground to the Pro-AI side who work more insularly.

@PentaFanAccount did you listen to his point on the difference between ai training via reference and humans training via reference? What is your thoughts on it?

Kinda hope it hurt their stock and reputation kinda bad. I know of Artisan, it's a kinda gunky Y-Combinator startup whose entire product is basically taking automated workflows of the Zapier sort of variety, and slapping LLMs and AI agent approaches into the mix. Everything beyond that is just techbro marketing preying hard-core on AI anxiety.

@creative_mindsrus1541 The satisfaction comes from the likes and engagements one gets from the "pretty AI images", that's its purpose. Instant gratification.

@JamesTrue but they purchase the copyrights from the artist. And the AI is no artist that can create copyrighted work as per current laws.

I think an impulse to survive and reproduce would be more threatening for an AI to have than not. AIs that do not care about survival have no reason to object to being turned off -- which we will likely have to do from time to time. AIs that have no desire to reproduce do not have an incentive to appropriate resources to do so, and thus would use their resources to further their program goals -- …