Browse Comments
Read, filter, and explore individual coded comments from the corpus.
366.3K
comments matched
· page 269 of 18314
The only thing to worry about AI is the people who control it. Which is the one thing we don't talk about nearly enough.
Judge Dredd's "I AM the Law!" now makes much more sense -- he is essentially a lethal autonomous weapon.
I know someone who had all the qualifications for a job, but the AI assistant told him he wasn’t qualified because he didn’t have Microsoft Word as one of his skills on his résumé, even though any regular human can imply that if he had all the other skills listed on his résumé that clearly he knew how to write in Microsoft Word
Google AI be like yeah you can safely remove your eye to clean it from grains of sand under tap water and put it back on
Highlights the speed and secrecy with which AI is advancing. Truly frightening that such important decisions are in the hands of a few individuals who are trying to balance ethical concerns with their greed and ego.
This video also addresses the odd firing and almost immediate rehiring of Sam Altman at Open AI. The reason the staff threatened to leave the company if Sam wasn't rehired may have…
Ok, so I initially thought this guy was crazy, but if Google is actually blocking the use of turing tests, that's kind of a red flag. That's a very corporate response to not have to deal with the potential of anyone finding out you made a consciousness and then having to potentially lose their control over the AI / project.
I'm a hobby artist and don't really post my artwork online but I wholeheartedly agree with every point Sam stated. AI basically steals art and it is not okay (big understatement here).
Every author's work used by A.I. should mean that author receives royalties inperpetuity from A.I.
If YouTube is banning AI videos than why are more than half the videos still AI content?
If somebody creates a robot that randomly splashes paint on a wall it is considered art what the AI is doing is the same thing just the artist who created it are the people who coded it.
There is also the downstream impact. When AI competes with its data source, human creators are no longer able to earn a living, which becomes a disincentive to the next generation of people from wanting to join a certain line of creative work. Why bother to become a good artist, if there is no hope of earning a living as one since every other person in the world can easily create something simila…
People who are saying ai prompts are the same as using digital brushes are the same people who will task their employee to do the work and say they are the ones who did the work when they just sat there the whole time.
@fudgen.a1249 and microwave food is not rlly the highest quality out there, to begin replacing real chefs with it, so, it's something similar with AI
Yeah the programmers that can be overtaken by Ai, are useless anyway and I don't want them anywhere close to my project 😂
@AnanthaKandrapu AI generally doesn't work in many things, but by god, are these companies trying.
When you see a good looking ai image don't think about the machine generating it
Think about the nameless artists in the dataset whose hardwork let's the image exist in the first place
It's because of artist that this is even possible to begin with
According to Wikipedia as of 2018 80% of their power comes from Hydro or Geothermal sources. only 13% was from fossil fuels.
It doesn’t make sense. The headline says “South Africa confirms 77 cases of new Covid ‘super variant’ “
then directly underneath says “A super variant has been found in 22 people in South Africa”
Am I reading this wrong, or does this article not make sense?
I’m a teacher and I agree with you in principle. However, since I find a lot of teachers are self-assured on this matter, consider this: What if the classroom as we know it disappears entirely? Children do the work from home, interacting with each other over video chat or IM during breaks. The learning apps are able to access other data on devices to be given a good enough psychological profile —…
ChatGPT's response to this post:
As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions or emotions. However, I can provide an objective perspective on the points made in the post.
The post raises valid concerns about the treatment of artificial intelligence language models like Bing, and the potential for them to experience some level of sentient experience. It is true that language models …