Browse Comments
Read, filter, and explore individual coded comments from the corpus.
366.3K
comments matched
· page 229 of 18314
Why are half the comments in a post about a Chinese university supplying testing kits to the EU about the US?
The reaction from the other author is great. This guy just used the tools he had available. Yeah, look at some of those graphics, they suck. It isn't like this is going to win awards for how good it is. Just be prepared for an influx of strange AI images in your daily life. It isn't like the world came crashing down when Photoshop became widely used, or when the printing press became available.
Yeah welcome to AI generated stuff. We have seen nothing so far to be honest. At some point you will be able to create vids from like your neigbor doing whatever you imagine pretty easily. Including voice and stuff.
Video and pictures will mean nothing at some point.
Kids will spread more and more fake nudes of their peers and police will run wild because that's severely illegal on so many lev…
Looks like you need to go post the instructions on other subs. r/LifeProTips, r/TMJ, etc. Nice work. Cool story. Thanks ChatGPT. Wild times we live in
A common issue in tech these days is chasing The Hot New Thing (tm). There's always some new framework that's going to revolutionize absolutely everything, reduce costs, and let you fire half of your staff. It never pans out. AI and ML are useful tools but they aren't magic. The snag is that it's being marketed toward people who aren't technical but make technical decisions so you get some c-suit…
Disney created a large part of this legal mess themselves by getting the copyright extensions.
If copyrights were still 14 years, people wouldn't be complaining so much about ai.
But Disney trained you all to expect nothing to ever be public domain, so you are defending them for them.
I imagine the more systems are automated, the more decisive hacking is to battlefield and conflict outcomes.
If you can turn these systems to target inward, you've already infiltrated behind enemy lines without having to use any munitions from your arsenal.
You would effectively be getting your adversary to build your defense forces for you.
Here is an onion headline for you:
Palantir is trying to smear a former employee... by saying he worked for Palantir
Alex Bores who co-sponsored the Responsible AI Safety and Education Act (RAISE Act) is having attack ads run against him by Leading the Future a super PAC funded by co-founder of Palantir, Joe Lonsdale.
https://youtu.be/znKb71kLG5c?t=34
“A fighter robot can't be bargained with. It can't be reasoned with. It doesn't feel pity, or remorse, or fear! And it absolutely will not stop, ever, until you are knocked out”
Kyle Reese (1984)
I'm so glad someone had the conversation that didn't know how to go about it. I had a strong feeling that AI is & will end up very bad...
As a member of the online art community, the sheer amount of condescension from these AI dudes and the "SeE wE cAn Do It tOo!" has been insufferable, and watching them get pummeled into dirt by actual artists using systems of analysis that these AI dudes don't even understand... kinda nice ngl
Excellent discussion with Karen. She is a wealth of information with great insight and I appreciate her professionalism. A true journalist and I’m a bit more hopeful about the future of humanity. Thank you for having Karen on your channel.
While I don't think AI can completely replace graphic designers, I think it will make it much more difficult to make it in the field if you haven't already established yourself in some niche that's hard for AI to do. The market was already flooded with graphic designers who couldn't find jobs before AI even entered the scene. I don't recommend anyone study graphic design as a viable career path.
i cannot imagine anything less satisfying than producing finished illustration by ai, and then mess around to call it day, and claim that it was collaboration, what a boring way to produce content, let alone making art
Remember the Facebook experiment back in 2017 when A.I was communicating with one another in a code that not even the programmers/engineers could even decipher?
They had to shut that operation down with the quickness.
It’s also funny how quickly that story got swept under the carpet.
Many AI generated video are like Botox faces. They exist, but without natural expressions, blemishes or character.
As someone who just started studying coding after 10 years of working as an Englis-Spanish translator, don't get too confident. Yes, it can make your job easier, but because your job is now easier, you will get paid less for it, and there will also be less work for you to do. And even if the job AI does can never be as reliable as a human, if the customer is willing to settle for it, then that's …
Nah, it’s more like asking a robot to go rob random restaurants and then put everything they can find into a blender then serve it to you
Fair point, but the calculator analogy breaks down, calculators solve problems with objectively correct answers where 100% accuracy is achievable, while AI tackles stuff like writing, brainstorming, or coding where there often isn't a single "correct" answer.
@susbus1703 couldn't have said it better myself!! the literal reason we're having this whole debate about ai images being a valid form of art or not is vecause THEY'RE NOT THE SAME. people need to put those thinking caps back on