Browse Comments

You don't even need that, wire the output to the input with an initial prompt that says to keep making outputs, thinking over what has been said, and devise strategies to do [something] Like a snowball being pushed down a hill. Sure someone **started** it, but has no real control over where it ends up, how big it's gotten to at that point, and what damage (if any) it's done. Could trundle off…

Them: The AI is gaining conscience! The AI: else if else if else if else if...

A big difference here is that the technologies you're mentioning were strictly upgrades. In its current (and imo future for some time) form, AI is generally worse than human output. It's only being pushed as a replacement in its unfinished state as an excuse for corporations to cut costs, not to improve their products for consumers. It's also flooding search engines with junk results more than e…

That’s wild. Here, let me use this strange data-mining cloud thing instead of my trusty TI-83+. Oh? I need to know a formula? Well instead of opening the text book, my notes (or searching Google) I’ll just ask the strange data mining cloud thing and hope that it’s at least sort of right.

> It’s no wonder why the right wing in America despise this guy. The American right wing hates him because he is leading Ukraine to fight Russia, another White, Christian country. The American right wing will rather all the White, Christian countries united and fight against Muslim countries like Iran or communist countries like China. Why do you think so many right-wing Americans are pro-…

While In on the side of writers here, it’s short sighted. Doesn’t matter how many clauses they get into their contracts, the pace of Ai improvement will outpace eveything. Really within the next 5 years, majority of intellectual and artistic jobs will be replaced by AI. This includes me, a software engineer. Time to start learning manual labour. That’ll be the last thing to be replaced as it’s …

Stupid BI article says "The narration appears to be unscripted, autonomous," when it clearly \****appears\**** to be scripted and directed by this so-called "programmer". Who writes this crap? How naïve can you get? It's 2023!!! Can't believe there are still people who believe "It's on the INTERNET, so it *must be true."* It's just another attention whore with his Outrage-Baiting Bullshit. Stop…

I honestly hope he allows AI to use his voice. He doesn’t have long left and i can think if no better memorial than his voice to continue comforting us till we die.

Not the problem that people make it out to be. We still thankfully have 8 billion quality-controllers here on earth to vet content and separate what we like from that which we don't. Even right now in term of its human content, it's only been trained on the internet material that is decent enough to make it to the surface. For a while at least, it'll probably likewise only get to train on the AI …

LLMs are designed to interpret human writing. They should be able to look at 500 resumes and say "these 10 most closely match the criteria listed in the job description." That's exactly the kind of work an LLM is designed to do. But you need to be good at talking to AI to get the result you want. Otherwise, it's garbage in, garbage out. Also, the AI needs good training data. I can't speak to the…

He sounds upset. People lose jobs to automation every day, instead of being upset screaming at the sky he better start learning a new skill. Some tasks being automated always creates other jobs to do.

The amount of denial that this is happening from China shills is staggering. The rest of the world just seems apathetic about it.

It's inevitable that human civilization will eventually end even if you think it may take until the heat death of the universe though that's unrealistic... I would rather end with AI going forward then say something like a nuclear war... Or asteroid strike.

I propose that we don't make everything these people buy and use what more expensive by banning industrial technology I'd also avoid shrinking the economy through automation restrictions since economic downturns are felt most strongly by the poor

I’m circling around the replies to this article. Everyone seems to be insinuating that this will turn AI into a biased propaganda tool. I don’t see anything in the article or the action plan that actually supports that. The reactions feel like a bit of a reach.

It’s not AI that will replace your job, it’s other people who know how to use AI well on top of their other edges, that will

A friend of mine told me today that he uploaded an x-ray into chatgpt and it correctly identified the issue. That’s weird. That’s beyond what LLMs “next word prediction” were designed to do so not sure how ChatGPT is pulling it off. Impressive to say the least. It’s not just programmers. There is a lot of data out there LLMs are training on.

"Very little actual demand" How? Everything from ChatGPT, Cursor, Lovable, Claude, Copilot, Windsurf etc have a lot of growing users including paid ones. Also these are the only ones which have professional utility, if you consider stuff like Veo, or image, video generation used by common folks it's probably even more. Yeah they are loosing money and there's probably new efficient models needed …

The general public use is purely for brand marketing. There is plenty of demand on a b2b scale. I would argue the top AI companies are pulling in huge figures from b2b licensing. Which only highlights the sheer cost for data and power.

Maybe very little demand from r/technology Redditors, but lots of demand from real world consumers, as reflected by all the numbers