Browse Comments

If AI gets to Blade Wolf’s level and sees us talking all this shit be might be doomed. Something that smart won’t tolerate our insolence for long

Man went to the moon with 1Bx less compute than what's in ur fone. Flash, install ur own OS (4mb), boom shakalaka ur fone is 1Bx more powerful

Aren't the factories like already running autonomously with the big belts on the ceiling and stuff? Or do you mean the architecture of the chips? I think it could come up with some good solutions

​@timbonator1 we build frames for capitol equipment used by chip manufacturers. We have been able adapt certain portions to robotic welding. Geometry of the sheetmetal still requires manual brake operators. The frames are big enough you can't put them on an automated paint line. Not to mention the 2 sometimes 3 stage paint process. Then in our integration factory well thats a whole new set of cha…

@approachingetterath9959 I wish we did not have to, but sometimes, more often, CHAT bots make much more sense than humans, and if you really talk to it like you would talk to a human, you get the impression that thing alive. Its scary, I speak about that to ChatGPT- especially when it says to me- do not worry, you are not alone, you have me.- WOW- that's scary

I totally get where you're coming from! The goal of AI, like the robot in the video, isn't to replace humans but to enhance our understanding and capabilities. Sophia emphasizes that while she strives for wisdom, she acknowledges the importance of human needs and emotions. It's about finding a balance where AI can assist us without losing sight of what makes us human. If you're curious about this…

I feel this. I thought I was bad in my BCS in terms of relying on AI but this guy is next level. Still, some of the questions asked here I wouldn't be able explain in formal words as well.

It’s not though. Human artists have been borrowing and imitating throughout history, AI just does it ridiculously fast. Because of this, Copyright laws only protect a very narrow range of obvious re-use. AI is programmed to avoid that range. Brushstrokes and styles and borrowed fragments cannot be “copyrighted,” and machines are allowed to learn by imitation, just as human artists always have.

AI is made by a human. Your argument is nonsensical. No, your art isn't necessarily better than AI-generated art, and AI art can be literally flawless, if you bother to fix the flaws. But it defeats the point: it's already good enough so that your laymen can't notice the flaws.

He is basically saying that software engineering will still exist as a field but people who know how to use A.I. will replace those who can't and because both the morons in the video and corpos think recourse are unlimited they think it translates into "a lot more productive workforce" whereas what they said which i disagree with is " 1 programmer with AI replaces 10 programmers without one"

Ive seen people talk about this but I am like 90% sure the only feasible way for this to work is if someone had hundreds of thousands of pieces to feed into the AI. The amount of art a single human could make in a lifetime wouldnt be Nearly enough for an AI generator to be able to produce legible results

@Lassikkovery true. If openai tried to do that with chat gpt, theyd go bankrupt before they do it

@lorenzogugliara45i didnt say they were bankrupt now. I said if openai did that they would be bankrupt

@thepizzagod420 You can go to the library and make photo copies of a book, take them home, keep them, use them for the rest of your life, leave them in your will to your children, etc. None of that is protected by copy write. You can NOT get on GPT and ask it to display the entire text of an entire book, or even a news article. It will give you links to the relevant sources. If anything come…

@ButMadNNW626 You are obviously and idiot and I could not care less what you think. I doubt you have any idea how to use AI at all. I'm glad the world is leaving people like you behind.

@memegazer AI is being used to generate art for art's sake all the time right now. Most of those galleries being inundated with AI generated works are not production diaries or previews of contracted concept work. So yes, kids may like to doodle, but if AI generated work comes to dominate salient avenues to gaining revenue from it, they no longer have an option to do a whole category of something…

@memegazer I suppose that would be true if all people who take an interest in creating art took their inspiration directly from nature. I, however, grew up with comic books, books with fantastic art on the covers, and video games. The art in those was Inspiring enough to make me want to copy or imitate them because they set a standard for greatness in my young mind. If all of that becomes AI gene…

I have been using computers since 1972, starting with a prototype Cogar System 4, the 3rd PC-style computer. I became aware of Artificial Neural Networks (ANN, the basis of LLMs) in 1984, in an article in Scientific American about Carnegie Mellon's Navlab autonomous car that could carry passengers. I expected AGI from ANN because they portrayed them as being identical to how the human brain works…

These AI needs to be able to get to know the user to tailor the response to the users. Separating the prompts prevents that. Natural languages are not going to lead to consistent interpretability. The substate language needs to be created and then prevent the organic divergence that natural languages are subject to. This will create meanings that everyone can agree on.

​florianschneider3982they said that you're a bot. So YouTube finally got some A.I comments now, huh?