Raw LLM Responses

Inspect the exact model output for any coded comment.

Look up by comment ID
Random samples — click to inspect
G Ai “art” is fine but it’s nowhere close to real art, it doesn’t really have a so… ytc_UgzG_sROA… G If he hand drew a Ghibli style picture that’s called inspiration but if AI does … ytc_UgyZgIu9n… G Either ChatGPT isn’t conscious yet and this exercise was not necessary or ChatGP… ytc_Ugzxf_c-z… G does the godfather of AI realize that UBI isn't possible? There isn't enough mo… ytc_UgxF7CPeD… G There can be a loophole here. The dude could take a high quality photograph of t… ytc_UgxtuYYn-… G If (when) you have AI sentient program on you PC and you chose to uninstall will… ytc_UgyDlqyAL… G There was a whole goddamn movie about why predictive policing doesn't work becau… ytc_UgyH5JUYE… G Waiting for Tesla Amazon to change to all ai and kick out developers, only to h… ytc_UgwzUVkWr…
Comment
@thepizzagod420 You can go to the library and make photo copies of a book, take them home, keep them, use them for the rest of your life, leave them in your will to your children, etc. None of that is protected by copy write. You can NOT get on GPT and ask it to display the entire text of an entire book, or even a news article. It will give you links to the relevant sources. If anything comes from this case at all it will be a more lenient interpretation of what copyright infringement is than we already have. The courts are a branch of the government. The government is not going to allow a law or even precedent to be established that will cripple our countries ability to compete with China in the AI race. For the NYT or anyone else to even begin to claim infringement they have to establish not only that someone else profited from their work but also that this cost revenue they would have otherwise received. This is virtually impossible. No one is using chat GPT to avoid purchasing a subscription to the NYT, and no one who uses GPT would not use it if it didn't have access to anything published by the NYT. So there can be no evidence that GPT specifically made money based on their copywriter materials, or that the NYT lost money due to their fair use of those materials.
youtube AI Responsibility 2026-04-11T17:2…
Coding Result
DimensionValue
Responsibilitycompany
Reasoningdeontological
Policyindustry_self
Emotionapproval
Coded at2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377
Raw LLM Response
[ {"id":"ytr_UgyLpQKUwMhVnnHXVQl4AaABAg.AVT7tYD3cnaAVWS1yU-ksR","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytr_UgxKTm5M5QkGNNzU1354AaABAg.AVT7L0wP6MIAVTAcvEYS0a","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"regulate","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytr_UgzumWCoHYdGP_ANALN4AaABAg.AVT6HpiLlHcAVTTyDLGxpS","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"}, {"id":"ytr_UgzumWCoHYdGP_ANALN4AaABAg.AVT6HpiLlHcAVTz6I2lgo4","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"}, {"id":"ytr_Ugxwc2rDPSveqbSlXzt4AaABAg.AVT5xW-I8glAVTB5WRxvZd","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytr_UgxYQxisfBIH5C5z8Nl4AaABAg.AVT5ObVsoORAVTQ3ZTeXDk","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytr_UgzUFkjB_QMaJwMqtIF4AaABAg.AVT58B9QIbIAVTh_wiDKGA","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"disapproval"}, {"id":"ytr_UgyIde8MreNYk5DgVBZ4AaABAg.AVT37D7Mp0ZAVTS5nhTMnZ","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"indifference"}, {"id":"ytr_UgyIde8MreNYk5DgVBZ4AaABAg.AVT37D7Mp0ZAVTaJIHz_DG","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"}, {"id":"ytr_UgyIde8MreNYk5DgVBZ4AaABAg.AVT37D7Mp0ZAVTdouC6U4h","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"} ]