Raw LLM — Corpus Dashboard

Look up by comment ID

Random samples — click to inspect

G This is proof that ai cant come up with its own things, that it steals from othe… ytc_UgxGy3bfk… G A super intelligent ai emerges into the public eye. We hear that the creator say… ytc_UgyYpNjBK… G Well, as a storyboard artist, most of my work comes from advertising. But these… ytc_Ugyrcsl2T… G “AI is destroying jobs” gets a lot more clicks than “the labor market is adaptin… ytc_UgyOwtOC0… G It depends on the industry you plan to work in. I believe that for print and pac… ytc_Ugzq7IhjB… G People like me will support AI others not. I do not buy into limiting intelligen… ytr_UgwP97-PJ… G Next Suggestions: (Asking ChatGPT) - *Is Alex O'Connor related to Alice O'Connor… ytr_Ugzz63RRH… G We need to start treating AI like a chemical or nuclear weapon and regulating a… ytr_Ugypkv13t…

Comment

@thepizzagod420 You can go to the library and make photo copies of a book, take them home, keep them, use them for the rest of your life, leave them in your will to your children, etc. None of that is protected by copy write. You can NOT get on GPT and ask it to display the entire text of an entire book, or even a news article. It will give you links to the relevant sources. If anything comes from this case at all it will be a more lenient interpretation of what copyright infringement is than we already have. The courts are a branch of the government. The government is not going to allow a law or even precedent to be established that will cripple our countries ability to compete with China in the AI race. For the NYT or anyone else to even begin to claim infringement they have to establish not only that someone else profited from their work but also that this cost revenue they would have otherwise received. This is virtually impossible. No one is using chat GPT to avoid purchasing a subscription to the NYT, and no one who uses GPT would not use it if it didn't have access to anything published by the NYT. So there can be no evidence that GPT specifically made money based on their copywriter materials, or that the NYT lost money due to their fair use of those materials.

youtube AI Responsibility 2026-04-11T17:2…

Coding Result

Dimension	Value
Responsibility	company
Reasoning	deontological
Policy	industry_self
Emotion	approval
Coded at	2026-04-27T06:24:59.937377

Raw LLM Response

[
{"id":"ytr_UgyLpQKUwMhVnnHXVQl4AaABAg.AVT7tYD3cnaAVWS1yU-ksR","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxKTm5M5QkGNNzU1354AaABAg.AVT7L0wP6MIAVTAcvEYS0a","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"mixed","policy":"regulate","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzumWCoHYdGP_ANALN4AaABAg.AVT6HpiLlHcAVTTyDLGxpS","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"approval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzumWCoHYdGP_ANALN4AaABAg.AVT6HpiLlHcAVTz6I2lgo4","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"none","emotion":"outrage"},
{"id":"ytr_Ugxwc2rDPSveqbSlXzt4AaABAg.AVT5xW-I8glAVTB5WRxvZd","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"deontological","policy":"liability","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgxYQxisfBIH5C5z8Nl4AaABAg.AVT5ObVsoORAVTQ3ZTeXDk","responsibility":"user","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"none","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgzUFkjB_QMaJwMqtIF4AaABAg.AVT58B9QIbIAVTh_wiDKGA","responsibility":"company","reasoning":"virtue","policy":"regulate","emotion":"disapproval"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyIde8MreNYk5DgVBZ4AaABAg.AVT37D7Mp0ZAVTS5nhTMnZ","responsibility":"distributed","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"industry_self","emotion":"indifference"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyIde8MreNYk5DgVBZ4AaABAg.AVT37D7Mp0ZAVTaJIHz_DG","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"},
{"id":"ytr_UgyIde8MreNYk5DgVBZ4AaABAg.AVT37D7Mp0ZAVTdouC6U4h","responsibility":"ai_itself","reasoning":"consequentialist","policy":"liability","emotion":"fear"}
]

Raw LLM Responses